{
 "id": "concept/aqr",
 "class": "concept",
 "slug": "aqr",
 "label": {
  "ar": "العَقْر",
  "en": "Wounding an animal that cannot be taken (aqr) and its effect on lawfulness and liability",
  "ur": "عقر (جانور کو زخمی کرنا)"
 },
 "summary": {
  "ar": "العقر في اللغة الجرح، ويقال عقر الفرس والبعير بالسيف إذا قطع قوائمه، وأصله ضرب قوائم الدابة، ويستعمله الفقهاء بمعنى الجرح في أي موضع من بدن الحيوان الوحشي غير المقدور عليه، وبمعنى ضرب قوائم الحيوان {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11764}. وللعقر أثر في حل أكل لحم الحيوان في الصيد، وفيما ند من الإبل والبقر والغنم فلا يقدر عليها صاحبها، وفي هذا خلاف عند المالكية، وأجاز الحنفية إلحاق الصيال به {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11765} {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11766}. وفي حيوانات الغنيمة عند العجز عن نقلها يختلف الفقهاء في عقرها، فمنع الشافعية والحنابلة عقرها إلا للأكل، وأجازه بعض الفقهاء عند الحاجة {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11767}. وفي ضمان ما يتلفه الكلب العقور إذا أطلق، خلاف بين الشافعية والحنفية والمالكية، وتفصيل بحسب إذن الدخول ووجه الاتخاذ {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11768} {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11769}.",
  "en": "In the lexicon, aqr is wounding; a horse or camel is hamstrung with a sword by cutting its legs. The jurists use it in two senses: a wound in any part of the body of a wild animal that cannot be caught, and the cutting of an animal's legs {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11764}. Wounding has an effect on whether the flesh of an animal may be eaten: a hunted animal that is caught by a wound is lawful when the conditions of the hunt are met, and an animal of domestic kind that runs wild and cannot be caught is lawful by wounding, according to the majority; the Malikis disagree on the wild animals of domestic kind {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11765} {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11766}. The Hanafis apply the same rule to an animal that attacks a man and cannot be restrained. On the spoils of war that cannot be carried away, the Shafi'is and Hanbalis forbid their wounding except to eat them, while some allow it in case of need {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11766} {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11767}. On the liability for a vicious dog that wounds a person or tears clothes, the Shafi'is and a view of Abu Yusuf hold the owner liable; Abu Hanifa does not, and Muhammad distinguishes whether the owner drove or urged it on; the Malikis divide liability for killing by intent and by the owner's knowledge {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11768} {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11769}."
 },
 "stub": false,
 "wings": [
  "ideas"
 ],
 "regions": [
  "global"
 ],
 "periods": [
  "period/prophetic-era"
 ],
 "tags": [],
 "aliases": [],
 "themes": [
  "ethics-and-character",
  "worship-and-the-pillars"
 ],
 "data": {
  "kind": "legal",
  "provenance": {
   "layer": "own-research",
   "source": "الموسوعة الفقهية الكويتية، نسخة نور بوك، مدخل «عَقْر»، ص 11764-11769 من المسح",
   "generated_by": "Claude Haiku 5.5",
   "model": "claude-haiku-5-5",
   "run": "mawsua-w07-batch26"
  },
  "sources": [
   "source/fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3"
  ],
  "status": {
   "review": "draft",
   "completeness": 1,
   "generated_by": "Claude Haiku 5.5; headword عَقْر complete on scan pp.11764-11769 (lexical sense, wounding in hunting and in flight, spoils of war, a vicious dog). The next headword عُقْر begins on scan p.11769 (bottom) and is a separate headword. The cross-references (النحر، الجرح، التذكية، صيال) are skipped. Footnote citations omitted; prophetic reports are referred to, not quoted"
  }
 },
 "prose": {
  "ar": {
   "sections": [
    {
     "heading": "موجز",
     "markdown": "العقر في اللغة الجرح، ويستعمله الفقهاء بمعنى الجرح في أي موضع من بدن الحيوان غير المقدور عليه، وبمعنى ضرب قوائم الحيوان {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11764}."
    },
    {
     "heading": "أثره في حل الأكل",
     "markdown": "يحل أكل الصيد إذا عُقر في أي موضع من بدنه بشروط الصيد، ويحل ما ند من الإبل والبقر والغنم فلم يقدر عليه صاحبه بعقره في أي موضع عند جمهور الفقهاء {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11765} {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11766}."
    },
    {
     "heading": "عقر حيوانات الغنيمة",
     "markdown": "إذا عجز المسلمون عن نقل الحيوان من دار الحرب ففي عقره خلاف، فمنع الشافعية والحنابلة عقره إلا للأكل، وأجاز بعضهم ذلك عند الحاجة {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11767}."
    },
    {
     "heading": "ضمان الكلب العقور",
     "markdown": "من أطلق كلباً عقوراً فعقر إنساناً ضمن عند الشافعية وأبي يوسف، وخالفهم أبو حنيفة. وتفصيل ذلك يختلف بحسب الإذن في الدخول واتخاذ الكلب {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11768} {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11769}."
    },
    {
     "heading": "مواطن البحث",
     "markdown": "تُنظر الذكاة في «ذكاة»، والصيد في «صيد»، والصيال في «صيال» {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11765}."
    }
   ],
   "frontmatter": {
    "id": "concept/aqr",
    "lang": "ar",
    "source_lang": "ar",
    "translators": []
   },
   "updated": "2026-10-23"
  },
  "en": {
   "sections": [
    {
     "heading": "Summary",
     "markdown": "In the lexicon, aqr is wounding. The jurists use it of a wound in any part of the body of a wild animal that cannot be caught, and of cutting the legs of an animal {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11764}."
    },
    {
     "heading": "Its effect on lawfulness of the flesh",
     "markdown": "A hunted animal wounded in any part of its body is lawful to eat when the conditions of the hunt are met; an animal of domestic kind that runs off and cannot be caught is lawful by wounding, according to the majority {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11765} {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11766}."
    },
    {
     "heading": "Wounding spoils of war",
     "markdown": "When the Muslims cannot carry away the animals of the enemy, the Shafi'is and Hanbalis forbid wounding them except to eat them; some jurists allow it in case of need {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11767}."
    },
    {
     "heading": "Liability for a vicious dog",
     "markdown": "Whoever sets loose a vicious dog that wounds a person is liable according to the Shafi'is and Abu Yusuf; Abu Hanifa does not hold him liable, and the rule varies with whether the owner entered the place, drove the dog and how he kept it {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11768} {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11769}."
    },
    {
     "heading": "Where to look further",
     "markdown": "Slaughter is treated under «zakat al-dhabh», hunting under «sayd», and aggression by an animal under «sayal» {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11765}."
    }
   ],
   "frontmatter": {
    "id": "concept/aqr",
    "lang": "en",
    "source_lang": "ar",
    "translators": [
     "Claude Haiku 5.5 (claude-haiku-5-5), draft translation"
    ]
   },
   "updated": "2026-10-23"
  },
  "ur": {
   "sections": [
    {
     "heading": "خلاصہ",
     "markdown": "لغت میں عقر زخمی کرنے کو کہتے ہیں، اور فقہاء اسے ایسے جانور کے کسی بھی حصے پر زخم کے معنی میں استعمال کرتے ہیں جو قابو میں نہ آ سکے {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11764}۔"
    },
    {
     "heading": "شکار کا عقر",
     "markdown": "شکار کو کسی بھی حصے پر زخمی کر کے اس کا گوشت حلال ہو جاتا ہے، جبکہ شرائط شکار پوری ہوں {cite:fiqh-mawsua-kuwaitiyya-noor-v3 p.11765}۔"
    }
   ],
   "frontmatter": {
    "id": "concept/aqr",
    "lang": "ur",
    "source_lang": "ar",
    "translators": [
     "Claude Haiku 5.5 (claude-haiku-5-5), draft translation"
    ]
   },
   "updated": "2026-10-23"
  }
 },
 "degree": 0,
 "contemporaries": [],
 "updated": "2026-10-23",
 "connections": [],
 "related": [
  "concept/alaniya",
  "concept/amd",
  "concept/asal",
  "concept/azm",
  "concept/desire-shahwa",
  "concept/doubt-shakk",
  "concept/halq-shaving",
  "concept/hay-a-fiqh"
 ],
 "license": {
  "prose": "CC BY-SA 4.0",
  "data": "CC0 1.0"
 }
}