Saved on this device only — nothing is sent anywhere.
Ten questions, one answer each. Mark them yourself — every option explains why.
the sources date Ramadan 2 AH / 624 CE
the first year was the founding year in Medina
Badr was six years before the conquest
Badr is seventh-century, not seventeenth
sources name the wells on the caravan road
the events had not reached Syria then
Egypt was outside this first conflict
Baghdad did not yet exist
the sources give a number near 313
that is nearer the conquest army six years later
fifty is far below the recorded count
the sira books give nothing near this
the caravan was the first target, then the army came
Rome was not their aim
the march was military, not a pilgrimage
a visit was not the reason
sources record the result and the names of dead and captives
the defeat in the books belongs to Uhud, not Badr
the state began stronger after Badr, not ended
the struggle ran on to the conquest of Mecca
memory treated it as the day the new state proved itself
the name is for meaning, not astronomy
Ramadan describes the timing, not the name''s reason
revelation began over a decade before Badr
accounts reach us from Ibn Ishaq, al-Tabari and others
Muslims wrote about Badr centuries earlier
Badr is among the most documented days in the sira
the Crusades came five centuries later
this is the name in the texts and memory
the name is for the battle, not the weekday
Badr was not a seasonal feast
the Day of Reckoning names a different day in the texts
the day ended in Medina''s victory and Quraysh captives
the Quraysh lost the fight and their leading men
the sources decide it a clear victory
the books document the fighting and the dead
the sources run the chain in this order
the Crusades came in 1095, centuries later
Baghdad fell in 1258, centuries later
al-Aqsa was built before Badr
60-second explainer · Glossary
