Cupping (ihtijam)

احتجام

Ihtijam is asking for cupping. Cupping is a medical act with the consequences of medicine; for instance, the cupper may look at the private parts of the cupped person in necessity. 1 The blood of cupping is impure like other blood, though wiping suffices to clean the wound out of necessity, and the mosque must be kept free of cupping. 1 Liability for harm caused by the cupper is treated under injuries. 1

Depth

At a glance

Era
The Prophetic Era
Region
Global / Diaspora
Review
Draft Completeness 0/5 · Help complete it

Development of law, theology and institutions

Summary

Ihtijam is asking for cupping. Cupping is a medical act with the consequences of medicine; for instance, the cupper may look at the private parts of the cupped person in necessity. 1 The blood of cupping is impure like other blood, though wiping suffices to clean the wound out of necessity, and the mosque must be kept free of cupping. 1 Liability for harm caused by the cupper is treated under injuries. 1

People and things also explored

Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)· Justice and uprightness (adl)· Contagion (adwa)· Pardon (afw) in purity, worship, contracts and penalties· Covenant (ahd) and the duty to keep it; oath by the covenant of God· Term, deadline (ajal)· Hired worker (ajir)· Stranger, outsider (ajnabi)

Sources

  1. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.1718
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Cupping (ihtijam)”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/ihtijam/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-23.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Ideas

Beliefs, concepts, sciences and schools, explained in plain words.
Related

Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)

In the lexicon, add is gripping a thing with the teeth and holding it. If a person bites another without right and a wound results, the biter must pay the damages for the wound, assessed as a just award by experts. If one man bites another's hand and the bitten man pulls it free so that the biter's front teeth fall out, most jurists hold that there is no liability, relying on a prophetic judgement in such a case; the Shafi'is limit this to a bitten man who chose the easiest means of release, and the preferred Maliki view requires compensation.