Bone and tissue grafts from a dead human or an animal in dental implants

العظام والأنسجة المستخرجة من إنسان ميت أو من حيوان في زراعة الأسنان

A question about using bone and tissue taken from a dead human, from cattle or from pigs in dental implants and gum treatment, in which Jordan's General Iftaa Department answered that treatment with impure substances and with parts of a dead human is permitted when there is no alternative, not when one exists, and that it makes no difference whether the patient is Muslim or not. The Department answered that Islam legislated seeking medical treatment, citing a hadith reported by Abu Dawud commanding treatment, and quoting Ba'ishn in Bushra al-Karim that treatment is recommended alongside reliance on God. It said the established principle among jurists is that treatment with impure substances is forbidden, but that they allowed it by exception when needed, other than pure wine, on condition that no pure alternative exists, quoting Zakariyya al-Ansari in Asna al-Matalib that treatment with an impure, non-intoxicating substance is permitted when a pure one is lacking; it added that something merely containing an impure element is all the more permitted. It said jurists agree that treatment with parts of a dead human is forbidden when any alternative exists, even an impure one, while the Shafi'is allowed it when there is no alternative, quoting Abd al-Hamid al-Shirwani in his glosses on Tuhfat al-Muhtaj that setting a bone with a dead human's bone may be permitted if nothing else suitable is found. It concluded that there is no objection to treatment with impure substances, other than pure wine, when there is no alternative, but not when one exists; that treatment with parts of a dead human is permitted when no alternative, even an impure one, is available; and that there is no difference between a Muslim and a non-Muslim patient.

Depth

At a glance

Review
Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Summary

A question about using bone and tissue taken from a dead human, from cattle or from pigs in dental implants and gum treatment, in which Jordan's General Iftaa Department answered that treatment with impure substances and with parts of a dead human is permitted when there is no alternative, not when one exists, and that it makes no difference whether the patient is Muslim or not. 1

The question

The questioner asked about using artificial bone and tissue extracted from the bones of a dead human, from cattle or from pigs in dental implants and for gum inflammation, and whether the ruling differs if the patient is Muslim or not. 1

The answer

The Department answered that Islam legislated seeking medical treatment, citing a hadith reported by Abu Dawud commanding treatment, and quoting Ba'ishn in Bushra al-Karim that treatment is recommended alongside reliance on God. 1 It said the established principle among jurists is that treatment with impure substances is forbidden, but that they allowed it by exception when needed, other than pure wine, on condition that no pure alternative exists, quoting Zakariyya al-Ansari in Asna al-Matalib that treatment with an impure, non-intoxicating substance is permitted when a pure one is lacking; it added that something merely containing an impure element is all the more permitted. 1 It said jurists agree that treatment with parts of a dead human is forbidden when any alternative exists, even an impure one, while the Shafi'is allowed it when there is no alternative, quoting Abd al-Hamid al-Shirwani in his glosses on Tuhfat al-Muhtaj that setting a bone with a dead human's bone may be permitted if nothing else suitable is found. 1 It concluded that there is no objection to treatment with impure substances, other than pure wine, when there is no alternative, but not when one exists; that treatment with parts of a dead human is permitted when no alternative, even an impure one, is available; and that there is no difference between a Muslim and a non-Muslim patient. 1

About this record

Jordan's General Iftaa Department published this fatwa on aliftaa.jo as no. 3977, dated 16 June 2025. 1 The museum records this text as a historical document attributed to the body or scholar that issued it; it issues no ruling of its own.

Connections

Explore the connections

About
Seeking treatment (tadawi)

People and things also explored

A charity using zakat to treat patients· Bequeathing one's organs after death· Using cow blood to make a medical preparation· Exchanging surplus medicines dispensed under health insurance· Cloning plants· Adding urea to moisturising creams· Wearing energy stones· Does anaesthesia break ablution?

Sources

  1. Jordan's General Iftaa Department (aliftaa.jo) , fatwa 3977

Original page

Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Bone and tissue grafts from a dead human or an animal in dental implants”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/work/fatwa-aliftaa-jo-bone-grafts-from-human-or-animal-sources/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-01.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Words

Qur'an, hadith, poetry, and the languages and scripts of Muslim peoples.
Related

A charity using zakat to treat patients

A question about a charity taking zakat to treat patients, buy medicines and equipment and fund health projects, in which Jordan's General Iftaa Department answered that zakat may not be spent on buying medicines, equipment or health projects, but may cover poor Muslims' treatment costs through their agency, while the state may spend it in whatever way best benefits the poor. The Department answered that the recipients of zakat are fixed in the verse on alms in Surat al-Tawba, and that zakat may not be paid to buy medicines and medical equipment or to cover laboratory costs and health projects; but spending it on poor Muslims and their treatment costs, not on general administrative or operating expenses, is unobjectionable. It said a hospital or centre may obtain an agency from the poor under which it receives the money on their behalf and then spends it on them, because zakat in principle must be put into the poor person's ownership; the exception is a government body, since the ruler may spend zakat on the poor in the way he judges most beneficial. It cited the jurists' view that the ruler may buy the poor person a property to draw income from, quoting al-Zarkashi as reported in Mughni al-Muhtaj, the gloss of al-Jamal on Sharh al-Manhaj that the ruler acts for the poor in receiving zakat, and Ibn Hajar al-Haytami in Tuhfat al-Muhtaj that he may bind the poor person not to dispose of what was bought, for the public interest. It noted that the Jordanian Iftaa Council decided in its resolution no. 99 that zakat may be used to help poor Muslim cancer patients, and closed with the hadith of Mu'adh that alms are taken from the Muslims' rich and returned to their poor.