Shahwa (desire: its effect on touch and ablution, on fasting and pilgrimage, on looking, on marriage by touch and on the breaking of the marriage bond)

الشَّهْوة

Shahwa is the longing of the self for pleasant things. Al-Mawardi held that the self should be given a measured share of what is lawful. It has effects in law. The Hanafis break ablution by touch only with gross contact; the Malikis and Hanbalis limit breach by touch to touch with desire; the Shafi'is make any contact of skin a breach. Emission by sustained looking breaks the fast in the view of the Malikis and Hanbalis but not in that of the Hanafis and Shafi'is. Looking with desire at a woman is forbidden, whether she is a stranger or one's kin, except one's wife. The Hanafis hold that touch or look with desire makes a marriage forbidden as in the case of unlawful intercourse. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Depth

At a glance

Era
The Prophetic Era
Region
Global / Diaspora
Review
Draft Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Ethics and characterFamily, marriage and kinshipWorship and the pillars

Definition and measure

Shahwa is the longing of the self for pleasant things. Al-Mawardi reports three views on how much of lawful desire to indulge: to suppress it, to indulge it as a help to vigour, or to keep a middle course, which he judged the best, since giving everything brings laxity and refusing everything brings dullness. 1 2

Touch with desire and ablution

  • The Hanafis: touch of a non-mahram woman, with or without desire, does not break ablution, except gross contact (the rubbing of the private parts or the back passage with the erect member without a barrier that keeps the body's warmth). Muhammad holds that only the emission of a fluid breaks it, which is the analogy; the Hanafi preference is the safer view.
  • The Malikis: touch by a grown man ablute, of someone who is normally aroused by such a person, breaks ablution, even if the touched person is not grown, or the touch is by a nail, hair or through a thin or thick covering. It requires desire or its presence, and a kiss on the mouth breaks it always.
  • The Shafi'is: contact of skin between a man and a woman breaks ablution, with or without desire, and touching the private parts breaks it in the palm; a close relative by blood, fosterage or marriage does not break it in the sounder view; touching a child, or hair, tooth or nail, does not break it in the sounder view.
  • The Hanbalis: touch of a man's skin with a woman's skin out of desire breaks ablution, citing the verse of the surah of Women (43), "or you have touched women". Touch of a beardless youth does not break it even with desire. Emission by a thought or repeated looking does not break it. 3 4

Desire and the fast

  • Emission from a look or a thought: the Hanafis and Shafi'is say it does not break the fast; the Shafi'is, in a weaker view, say it does if one is used to emission from looking or repeats the look. The Malikis and Hanbalis say that emission from a continued look breaks the fast, since it is an act that gives pleasure and can be avoided; emission from a thought breaks it for the Malikis and not for the Hanbalis. 4
  • Emission through a kiss, touch or embrace breaks the fast by consensus. The seminal fluid of desire (madhi) does not break it for the Hanafis and Shafi'is, but breaks it for the Malikis and Hanbalis. 8

Desire and pilgrimage

Intercourse before standing at 'Arafa spoils the pilgrimage by consensus. After standing and before the first release, most jurists say it spoils it and requires a camel; the Hanafis say it does not spoil it, but a sacrifice is due. Touch with desire, kissing, or contact without intercourse requires a sacrifice from everyone. Looking with desire until emission requires nothing for the Hanafis and Shafi'is, unlike the Malikis and Hanbalis. 8

Looking with desire

  • A wife: a husband may look at all of her body with desire.
  • A mahram: the Hanafis and Hanbalis allow an adult to look at what usually shows, such as the neck, head, hands and feet; the Hanafis add the breast, legs and upper arms but not back or belly. The Shafi'is widen it to all but the navel-to-knee zone. The Malikis allow only face and hands. Looking at a mahram with desire is forbidden by consensus.
  • A free stranger: looking with desire at her is forbidden without dispute. The Hanafis and Malikis allow looking at face and hands; the Malikis forbid the feet. The Shafi'is forbid a man from looking at the body of a free adult stranger, and forbid looking at face and hands where there is fear of temptation; in their sounder view looking at face and hands is not forbidden without desire and without fear, as the majority hold. The Hanbalis forbid looking at her whole body in the apparent view of Ahmad; al-Qadi allows face and hands with dislike when there is no desire and no fear. The jurists agree that looking at a woman with desire is forbidden except one's wife and those lawful to one. 8 5 6

Touch with desire

Where looking is forbidden, touch with desire is forbidden too, for touch stirs desire more than looking. Where looking is lawful, touch is lawful if one is safe from desire; a stranger's face and hands may not be touched even when one is safe. 6 7

Desire in marriage and return

The Hanafis and Hanbalis hold that the bond of in-law relation is established by unlawful intercourse; the Hanbalis add sodomy in one report, but in the sounder view sodomy does not establish it. The Hanafis hold that touch or look with desire creates the same bond, so the ancestors of the woman touched and her descendants become forbidden to the man, and the measure of desire is the stirring of the organ or its increase; this is the Hanafi fatwa. Return to a divorced wife is effected by word and act according to the majority, while the Shafi'is require words. 6 7

Breaking desire

A man who cannot marry should break his desire by fasting, following the saying: young men who are able to marry, let them marry, for it lowers the gaze and guards the private parts; whoever cannot, let him fast, for it is a shield. It is disliked to seek to cut desire by camphor and the like, and forbidden if it cuts desire entirely, as castration would. 7

People and things also explored

Shakk (doubt in law: its kinds, the rule that certainty is not removed by doubt, and its effect on worship, contracts, penalties and evidence)· Joy and gladness (al-farah wal-surur)· Openness as against secrecy in acts of worship, charity and public notice (alaniya)· Deliberate act (amd), as against error, and its rulings· Hardship and fear of sin ('anat) in marrying a slave-woman· The sacrifice for a newborn (aqiqa): its ruling, age, animals and manner· Wounding an animal that cannot be taken (aqr) and its effect on lawfulness and liability· Honey: its medicinal use and zakat (asal)

Sources

  1. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.10236
  2. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.10237
  3. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.10238
  4. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.10239
  5. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.10241
  6. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.10242
  7. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.10243
  8. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.10240
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Shahwa (desire: its effect on touch and ablution, on fasting and pilgrimage, on looking, on marriage by touch and on the breaking of the marriage bond)”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/desire-shahwa/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-23.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Ideas

Beliefs, concepts, sciences and schools, explained in plain words.
Related

Shakk (doubt in law: its kinds, the rule that certainty is not removed by doubt, and its effect on worship, contracts, penalties and evidence)

Shakk is hesitation between two possibilities, whether they are equal or one prevails. The rule of the jurists is that certainty is not removed by doubt, that doubt about a shortfall is treated as a shortfall, and that doubt about an addition is treated as an addition. Doubt has different effects according to its origin: a slaughtered animal whose slaughter is in doubt is forbidden; the worshipper builds on certainty in prayer, circumambulation and fasting; divorce is not effective on mere doubt about whether it was pronounced; penalties are averted by doubt; and concessions do not rest on doubt. The schools differ on some cases, such as doubt about a breach of ablution after certainty of purity, the number of rak'as, and the number of divorces.