Severance of a part from a living body (ibana)

الإبانة

For the jurists, ibana means separation or severance, and it includes the separation of a part from a living creature. The Kuwaiti encyclopedia states the general rule: what is severed from a living creature, other than the wool and hair of an edible animal, is like its carrion, on the basis of a report transmitted in several forms. The encyclopedia notes that critics judged its chain weak in most routes, while al-Tirmidhi graded it hasan; and that a part cut after slaughter and before death is lawful to eat, though disliked in general.

Depth

At a glance

Era
The Prophetic Era
Region
Global / Diaspora
Review
Draft Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Health, body and death

Overview

For the jurists, ibana is separation or cutting off. It covers the severance of a part from a living creature. The Kuwaiti encyclopedia states the general rule: what is severed from a living creature, other than the wool and hair of an edible animal, is like its carrion, on the basis of a report transmitted in several forms. The encyclopedia notes that the critics judged its chain weak, and that the report's grading is contested. 1 2

Definition

The word means to show, to separate or to cut off. The jurists mostly use it in the sense of separation and cutting. One use is a wife's divorce by a final divorce or by khul': she then has her own freedom, and the husband may take her back only by a new contract. 1

The general rule

The jurists agree in general that what is severed from a living creature, other than the wool and hair of an edible animal, is like its carrion, on the report "what is severed from a living creature is dead." 1

The encyclopedia's footnote reports that the report has several versions, including one from Abu Sa'id in al-Hakim with the wording "what is cut from a living creature is dead." It records that al-Dhahabi corrected al-Hakim's authentication, that the chain of Abu Dawud's version is weak, that al-Tirmidhi called one version hasan gharib, and that al-Daraqutni named its defect. The grading is presented here as the encyclopedia gives it. 1 2

A part cut after slaughter and before death may be eaten, though it is generally disliked. 2

Where the topic is treated

The discussion appears in several chapters: impurity, nakedness (touching and looking at a severed organ), burial, divorce and khul', li'an, slaughter (how to slaughter), hunting, and injury to limbs. 2

People and things also explored

Bone (adhm): purity, use and retaliation· Fleshy growth in the wife's womb and the right to annul (afal)· Grief and worry (al-huzn)· The clot stage of the embryo (alaqa) and the rulings on its loss· Alya (the rump, and its rulings)· Anf (the nose, and its rulings in purification, prayer, fasting and retaliation)· Anthayan (the two testicles, and rulings on them)· Reason as the basis of legal capacity and of the blood-money (aql)

Sources

  1. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.1412
  2. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.1413
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Severance of a part from a living body (ibana)”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/ibana/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-19.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Objects

Manuscripts, art, architecture and relics from collections worldwide.
Related

Bone (adhm): purity, use and retaliation

In the lexicon, adhm is the bone that has flesh on it, plural 'idham and 'izam. Most jurists hold that a human bone is pure, whether living or dead, of a Muslim or not; that a fish bone stays pure after death; and that the bone of a lawfully slaughtered edible animal is pure and may be used. The bone of carrion, or of a non-edible animal, is impure according to the Malikis, Shafi'is, Hanbalis and Ishaq, and cannot be purified; the Hanafis hold it pure, and 'Umar disliked oiling in ivory. On cleansing after excretion with a bone, the Shafi'is and Hanbalis forbid it; the Hanafis dislike it as forbidden but accept that it suffices; the Malikis forbid a carrion bone and allow a pure bone with disapproval. Most jurists allow retaliation for a bone only at a joint, since equality cannot be achieved elsewhere.