Ijtihad (independent juristic reasoning)

الاجتهاد

Ijtihad: the jurist's exertion of effort to derive a ruling from the revealed sources. Al-Sayis's view is that it discloses God's ruling rather than legislating, and binds only the mujtahid and those who follow him.

Depth

At a glance

Review
Draft Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Development of law, theology and institutions

Overview

The jurist's exertion of his utmost effort to derive the legal ruling from the legal evidences 1. Al-Sayis holds it began in the age of revelation; its aim is to uncover God's ruling in the case, not to create legislation — binding on the mujtahid and his followers, bound by the Shari'a's general rules 2. Its ways are many: taking the ruling from the texts' literal sense or from their rationale.

Connections

Explore the connections

Related to
The eight principles of education in the Qur'an and Sunna

People and things also explored

Equality in Islam· Seeking knowledge· Shura in Islam· Tarbiya (education and upbringing)· The eight principles of education in the Qur'an and Sunna· Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)· Justice and uprightness (adl)· Contagion (adwa)

Sources

  1. The Emergence of Ijtihad-based Jurisprudence and Its Stages — Muhammad Ali al-Sayis , p. 11
  2. The Emergence of Ijtihad-based Jurisprudence and Its Stages — Muhammad Ali al-Sayis , p. 24, 26
  • Principles of Education in the Holy Qur'an and the Prophetic Sunna — Ahmad Muhammad al-Bari
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Ijtihad (independent juristic reasoning)”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/ijtihad/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-22.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Related

Equality in Islam

Muhammad al-Khidr Husayn holds that people are created alike in nature, then differ in social life, and that Islam set obligations on a basis of equal standing: no noble is privileged over a commoner, no ruler over the people, and piety does not change limits or rights (pp. 58-59). He argues from the brotherhood of believers, and from the Caliph Abu Bakr's principle that the strong is weak until right is taken from him and the weak is strong until he is given his right (pp. 60-61). He notes that a judge does not rule for himself and that Umar referred a dispute to a man of the people (p. 61). This is the author's reading of the texts and reports he cites. Muhyi al-Din Afifi Ahmad holds that people share one origin and so are equal in rights, duties and reward, and that colour, sex and language give no ground for distinction (pp. 113-114). He cites a hadith against wronging a covenanted non-Muslim (p. 114).