Iqtisar (a ruling taking effect only at the moment it arises)

اقتصار

In the jurists' usage, iqtisar means that a ruling takes effect when its cause arises, and not before or after, as with an immediate divorce. Ibn 'Abidin defines it as the ruling taking effect now. The Hanafi scholar al-Haskafi lists four ways a ruling takes effect: inqilab (a non-cause becoming a cause), iqtisar, istinad (taking effect now and tracing back to an earlier time), and tabyin (showing that the ruling had held earlier). Istinad has retroactive effect, while iqtisar does not. Some modern writers propose the terms fasakh and infisakh for dissolution by istinad, and inha' and intiha' for dissolution by iqtisar. The Shafi'is distinguish between a dissolution that removes a contract from its origin and one that removes it from its time, the latter including dissolution for a defect or bankruptcy. Iqtisar covers immediate contracts such as sale, salam, hire and qirad, and immediate dissolutions such as divorce and manumission. Those with retroactive effect fall under istinad. 1 2 3 4

Depth

At a glance

Era
The Early Abbasid Caliphate
Region
Global / Diaspora
Review
Draft Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Development of law, theology and institutions

Definition

In the jurists' usage, iqtisar means that a ruling takes effect when its cause arises, and not before or after it, as with an immediate divorce. Ibn 'Abidin defines it as a ruling taking effect at the present moment. 1 2

Ways a ruling takes effect

Al-Haskafi lists four ways: inqilab, iqtisar, istinad and tabyin. Inqilab is when something that was not a cause becomes one, as when a conditional divorce takes effect once its condition is met. 2

Iqtisar and istinad

Istinad is a ruling taking effect now and then tracing back to an earlier time, provided the subject remains throughout, so it has retroactive effect. Iqtisar has none. 2 3 Some modern writers propose the terms fasakh and infisakh for dissolution by istinad, and inha' and intiha' for dissolution by iqtisar. 3

The Shafi'i distinction on dissolution

The Shafi'is distinguish a dissolution that removes a contract from its origin from one that removes it from its time. The second group includes dissolution for a defect in the goods, for bankruptcy, revocation of a gift, and annulment of a marriage for a defect. The sounder view in each case is that it takes effect from that time. 3 4

Tabyin

Tabyin is when a ruling is shown to have held from an earlier time. A man who makes a divorce depend on a condition, and then the condition is found to have been met the day before, is divorced from that earlier day. Tabyin differs from iqtisar, where the ruling holds only from the present. 4

Scope

Iqtisar covers immediate contracts such as sale, salam, hire and qirad, and immediate dissolutions such as divorce and manumission. Where a dissolution has retroactive effect, it falls under istinad. For example, a man who says "you are divorced a month before so-and-so dies" is not divorced until that person dies a month later, and then the divorce is traced back to the start of the month. 4

People and things also explored

Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)· Justice and uprightness (adl)· Contagion (adwa)· Pardon (afw) in purity, worship, contracts and penalties· Covenant (ahd) and the duty to keep it; oath by the covenant of God· Term, deadline (ajal)· Hired worker (ajir)· Stranger, outsider (ajnabi)

Sources

  1. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.3177
  2. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.3178
  3. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.3179
  4. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.3180
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Iqtisar (a ruling taking effect only at the moment it arises)”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/iqtisar/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-23.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Ideas

Beliefs, concepts, sciences and schools, explained in plain words.
Related

Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)

In the lexicon, add is gripping a thing with the teeth and holding it. If a person bites another without right and a wound results, the biter must pay the damages for the wound, assessed as a just award by experts. If one man bites another's hand and the bitten man pulls it free so that the biter's front teeth fall out, most jurists hold that there is no liability, relying on a prophetic judgement in such a case; the Shafi'is limit this to a bitten man who chose the easiest means of release, and the preferred Maliki view requires compensation.