Ittiba' (following; returning to a proven ruling)

اتّباع

In the language, ittiba' means walking behind another; it also carries the senses of following someone in prayer, obeying a command, acting on another's word, and demanding a due. As a technical term it is returning to a saying that rests on a proof. 1 The jurists separate it from taqlid: taqlid is acting on another's word without proof, while ittiba' is returning to a saying that rests on proof. 2 Its ruling depends on what is followed: following the sharia and the Prophet ﷺ in matters of religion is obligatory, a layperson must follow the mujtahids according to the careful usulis, obedience to those in authority is obligatory outside sin, following a funeral is recommended, and following desire is forbidden. 2 3 The word also means demanding a debt, so a creditor may pursue his debtor or the surety. 3

Depth

At a glance

Era
The Prophetic Era
Region
Global / Diaspora
Review
Draft Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Development of law, theology and institutions

Summary

Ittiba' means in the language walking behind another, and also following someone in prayer, obeying a command, acting on another's word and demanding a due. As a technical term it is returning to a saying that rests on a proof. 1 The jurists separate it from taqlid, which is acting on another's word without proof. 2 Its ruling depends on what is followed. 2

General ruling

Following the sharia and the Prophet in matters of religion is obligatory, and there is no dispute on this among the whole community, mujtahid and muqallid alike. 2 The Prophet's natural acts are, by agreement, permissible for the community to follow, and what he explained takes the ruling of what it explains. 2 Following the imam in prayer is obligatory by agreement, following a funeral is recommended, and following desire is forbidden. 3

Following a mujtahid

There is no ijtihad where a definitive proof exists, such as the obligation of prayer and the other agreed duties. 2 A mujtahid who reached a ruling by his own effort may not follow another against it; a layperson must follow the mujtahids, according to the careful usulis. Obedience to those in authority is obligatory outside sin. 2

Following in the sense of demanding a debt

A creditor has the right to pursue his debtor for the debt, or the surety if there is one. This applies to a debt attached to the person; a debt attached to a specific thing may be pursued in that thing. 3

Where it is discussed

The topic is treated in the chapters on ijtihad and taqlid in usul, on congregational prayer, on carrying the dead in the funeral prayer, on the imamate in books of governance, and on restraint, pledge, deposit and surety. 3

People and things also explored

Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)· Justice and uprightness (adl)· Contagion (adwa)· Pardon (afw) in purity, worship, contracts and penalties· Covenant (ahd) and the duty to keep it; oath by the covenant of God· Term, deadline (ajal)· Hired worker (ajir)· Stranger, outsider (ajnabi)

Sources

  1. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.1468
  2. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.1469
  3. al-Mawsu'a al-Fiqhiyya al-Kuwaitiyya, Noor-Book copy (file named v3) , p.1470
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Ittiba' (following; returning to a proven ruling)”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/ittiba/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-10-23.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Ideas

Beliefs, concepts, sciences and schools, explained in plain words.
Related

Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)

In the lexicon, add is gripping a thing with the teeth and holding it. If a person bites another without right and a wound results, the biter must pay the damages for the wound, assessed as a just award by experts. If one man bites another's hand and the bitten man pulls it free so that the biter's front teeth fall out, most jurists hold that there is no liability, relying on a prophetic judgement in such a case; the Shafi'is limit this to a bitten man who chose the easiest means of release, and the preferred Maliki view requires compensation.