Zakat owed by a deceased father and held back by his heirs

زكاة مستحقة على الأب المتوفى أخرها الورثة

A question about zakat owed by a deceased father and held back by his heirs, in which Jordan's General Iftaa Department answered that zakat is a debt owed by the deceased, paid from the estate before division for all the years missed, and that money set apart as zakat is not liable to zakat again because it now belongs to the poor, though whoever delays paying it when able is sinful. The Department answered that zakat is a debt owed by the deceased and must be paid for the period he did not pay before the estate is divided, if it is certain he did not pay it; it is calculated from the day he owned the nisab and a year passed on it, so the zakat for all the previous years is taken from the estate before division. It said that money set apart and kept as zakat is not liable to zakat again, because it has become the property of the poor, but the person responsible sins by delaying its payment if he was able to pay and did not. It quoted al-Shirazi in al-Muhadhdhab (1/268) on the two views of al-Shafi'i about what zakat attaches to: the old view, that it is owed as a liability with the property pledged for it, and the new and correct view, that it attaches to the property itself; on the latter, if someone does not pay until another year passes, no zakat is due for the second year, because the poor already own the obligatory share of the nisab. It also quoted al-Shirbini in Mughni al-Muhtaj (2/137) that zakat attaches to the property as a partnership in its amount, with other views treating it as a pledge, or as owed only as a liability, the weakest of them.

Depth

At a glance

Review
Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Summary

A question about zakat owed by a deceased father and held back by his heirs, in which Jordan's General Iftaa Department answered that zakat is a debt owed by the deceased, paid from the estate before division for all the years missed, and that money set apart as zakat is not liable to zakat again because it now belongs to the poor, though whoever delays paying it when able is sinful. 1

The question

The questioner said his father died owing zakat for several years that he had not paid; the heirs intended to pay it on his behalf but delayed, although the money had been available to them for about two and a half years. Is zakat due on this money they have kept? 1

The answer

The Department answered that zakat is a debt owed by the deceased and must be paid for the period he did not pay before the estate is divided, if it is certain he did not pay it; it is calculated from the day he owned the nisab and a year passed on it, so the zakat for all the previous years is taken from the estate before division. 1 It said that money set apart and kept as zakat is not liable to zakat again, because it has become the property of the poor, but the person responsible sins by delaying its payment if he was able to pay and did not. 1 It quoted al-Shirazi in al-Muhadhdhab (1/268) on the two views of al-Shafi'i about what zakat attaches to: the old view, that it is owed as a liability with the property pledged for it, and the new and correct view, that it attaches to the property itself; on the latter, if someone does not pay until another year passes, no zakat is due for the second year, because the poor already own the obligatory share of the nisab. It also quoted al-Shirbini in Mughni al-Muhtaj (2/137) that zakat attaches to the property as a partnership in its amount, with other views treating it as a pledge, or as owed only as a liability, the weakest of them. 1

About this record

Jordan's General Iftaa Department published this fatwa on aliftaa.jo as no. 3682, dated 8 February 2022. 1 The museum records this text as a historical document attributed to the body or scholar that issued it; it issues no ruling of its own.

Connections

Explore the connections

About
Zakat (alms tax)· Debt (dayn) in fiqh

People and things also explored

Writing off a debt and counting it as zakat· Wealth in Islam· Muwatta 2020· Zakat (obligatory alms)· A charity using zakat to treat patients· A mother paying her zakat to her children· An agent paying his principal's zakat from his own money and reclaiming it· Appointing an agent to distribute zakat and charity

Sources

  1. Jordan's General Iftaa Department (aliftaa.jo) , fatwa 3682

Original page

Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Zakat owed by a deceased father and held back by his heirs”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/work/fatwa-aliftaa-jo-zakat-owed-by-a-deceased-father-and-set-aside-by-heirs/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-02.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Words

Qur'an, hadith, poetry, and the languages and scripts of Muslim peoples.
Related

Writing off a debt and counting it as zakat

A question about writing off a debt and counting it as zakat, in which Jordan's General Iftaa Department answered that it does not count as zakat and is a charitable gift, and that it is better for the creditor to collect the debt and then give the debtor from his zakat if he is eligible. The Department answered that writing off a debt with the intention of counting it as zakat does not discharge zakat, but is a rewarded act of charity, because zakat requires the giver to intend it at the time of handing over the money, and the debt is already established on the borrower, so the intention cannot be transferred to zakat. It said it is better for the creditor to collect the debt from the debtor and then give him back all or part of the zakat he owes, if the debtor belongs to the eight categories entitled to zakat. It quoted Umdat al-Salik that if the giver hands money to a poor person on condition that he return it in payment of a debt, or says, 'I have made what you owe me zakat,' it does not count, whereas if he gives it intending that the debtor repay him from it, without making that a condition, it counts, and the debtor is not bound to repay.