At a glance
- Region
- Global / Diaspora
Trade and financeLaw and courts
Summary
Bay' al-istijrar is taking what one needs from a trader bit by bit, as custom has it, and settling the account afterwards. Ibn Abidin treats the question in Radd al-Muhtar under the side heading "on sale by istijrar". 1
The difficulty: sale of what no longer exists
He reports from al-Bahr that one condition of the object of a contract is that it exist, so that no sale is concluded over what does not exist; he then notes that the jurists were lenient in one case they took out of this rule, from al-Qunya: things taken from a trader as current expenses, as is customary, without a sale, such as lentils, salt and oil, and then bought after they have been used up; this is valid. 1
How it was explained
Known and unknown price
Ibn Abidin holds that al-Nahr's explanation works where the price is known at the time of taking, as with bread and meat: each time something is taken, a sale is concluded at its known price, so it is not a sale of what does not exist. 2 Where the price is unknown at the time of taking, no sale by ta'ati is concluded because the price is unknown; if the taker uses the goods, which the trader handed over willingly in return for compensation, no sale is concluded even if a sale was intended, since a sale is not concluded by intention; it resembles a loan guaranteed by its like or its value, and when the two agree on an amount in place of the like or value, the taker's debt is cleared. 2
The baker case
He reports from al-Ashbah and al-Qunya: if a man gives dirhams to a baker saying "I buy from you a hundred mann of bread" and then takes five mann a day, the sale is defective and what he eats is disapproved, because he bought bread not pointed to, so the object was unknown. If he gives the dirhams and takes five mann a day without saying at the outset "I buy from you", it is valid and lawful even if he intended purchase when paying, since a sale is not concluded by mere intention but is concluded at the moment of taking by ta'ati, when the object is known. 2
When the value is reckoned
He reports from al-Ashbah, from al-Tatimma: if someone took rice, lentils and the like, having paid a dinar to be drawn on, and they later disputed its value, the value on the day of taking counts, since it was a bargaining when the price was mentioned. 2
Related entries
Opinions on the question
First opinion · Sunni tradition (the museum's frame) · Sunni, Hanafi: an explanation by some scholars (reported by al-Hamawi)Main reference
More opinions (2)
Sunni tradition (the museum's frame) · Sunni, Hanafi: the explanation of the author of al-NahrMain reference
Connections
- Ruled on by
- Radd al-Muhtar ala al-Durr al-Mukhtar
- Part of
- Fiqh
People and things also explored
Bay' al-ta'ati (sale by conduct)· Kasad al-nuqud (when money stops circulating or changes in value)· Compensation for bare rights and giving up posts for money· Bughat (rebels against the imam)· Itq (manumission)· Liability of craftsmen (the common hired worker)· Judgement on one witness and the claimant's oath· Ibn Abidin
Sources
- Ibn Abidin, Radd al-Muhtar ala al-Durr al-Mukhtar, vol. 4 (Bulaq, 1271 AH) , p.19
- Ibn Abidin, Radd al-Muhtar ala al-Durr al-Mukhtar, vol. 4 (Bulaq, 1271 AH) , p.20
Cite this page
islam.museum contributors. “Bay' al-istijrar (sale on running account)”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/bay-al-istijrar/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-04.
Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · Help complete it · JSON