Is every mujtahid right? (taswib and takhti'a)

التصويب والتخطئة: هل كل مجتهد مصيب؟

A question of legal theory: when two mujtahids reason on a question and reach different answers, are both right, or is one right and the other mistaken? The life of al-Kasani in the introduction to the Bada'i' edition relates that he debated it with a jurist in the land of Rum: the jurist ascribed to Abu Hanifa the view that every mujtahid is right; al-Kasani answered that the sound report from Abu Hanifa is that one is right and the other mistaken, the truth lying on one side, and that the other view is the Mu'tazila's.

Depth

At a glance

Region
Global / Diaspora

Contested: This record includes matters on which scholars differ. The speaker's views are labelled as his, and other views are marked where no cited source yet exists.

Development of law, theology and institutions

Summary

The question of taswib and takhti'a belongs to ijtihad in legal theory: when two mujtahids reason on a question and differ, are both right, or is one right and the other mistaken? It comes up in the life of al-Kasani in the introduction to the edition of Bada'i' al-Sana'i'. 1

The debate as the editors relate it

The editors relate that al-Kasani debated this question with a jurist in the land of Rum; the jurist said the report from Abu Hanifa is that every mujtahid is right; al-Kasani said: no, the sound report from Abu Hanifa is that of two mujtahids one is right and one mistaken, and the truth lies on one side, and what you say is the Mu'tazila's doctrine; words passed between them and ended with al-Kasani raising his whip at the jurist, which led to his being sent as an envoy to Aleppo. 1 2

Not covered here

This entry rests only on the report of the debate; the treatment of the question by Sunni and other legal theorists is to be added from books of usul.

Opinions on the question

The question: When two mujtahids differ on a question, are both right or is one mistaken?

First opinion · Sunni tradition (the museum's frame) · Sunni, Hanafi: al-KasaniMain reference

one of the two mujtahids is right and the other mistaken, the truth lying on one side; for him this is the sound report from Abu Hanifa. 1
More opinions (2)

Sunni tradition (the museum's frame) · Sunni, Hanafi: the jurist he debated (unnamed)Main reference

the report from Abu Hanifa is that every mujtahid is right. 1

The Mu'tazili view from their own books: not yet sourced (needs_source) viewOther opinion

al-Kasani ascribed the view that all are right to the Mu'tazila; their view and the legal theorists' detailed treatment are not given here.

Connections

Explore the connections

Part of
Ijtihad (independent juristic reasoning)

People and things also explored

The four kinds of muftis· Irshad al-Fuhul ila Tahqiq al-Haqq min Ilm al-Usul· Ijtihad (independent juristic reasoning)· The eight principles of education in the Qur'an and Sunna· IIFA resolution 262 (7/26) on sharia governance in Islamic financial institutions· May one ask artificial intelligence for a fatwa?· Biting and the liability for injury it causes (add)· Justice and uprightness (adl)

Sources

  1. al-Kasani, Bada'i' al-Sana'i' fi Tartib al-Shara'i', vol. 1 (ed. Ali Muhammad Mu'awwad and Adil Ahmad Abd al-Mawjud, Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, 2003) , p.74
  2. al-Kasani, Bada'i' al-Sana'i' fi Tartib al-Shara'i', vol. 1 (ed. Ali Muhammad Mu'awwad and Adil Ahmad Abd al-Mawjud, Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, 2003) , p.75
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Is every mujtahid right? (taswib and takhti'a)”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/taswib-al-mujtahidin/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-06.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · Help complete it · JSON

Wing

Ideas

Beliefs, concepts, sciences and schools, explained in plain words.
Related

The four kinds of muftis

A classification set out by Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya in I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in of those who have set themselves up to give fatwas: the mujtahid who knows the Book, the Sunna and the Companions' views; the mujtahid bound to his imam's school; the mujtahid within the school who does not go beyond his imam's sayings; and the pure imitator who has memorised his school's rulings. On it he builds the standing of each kind and the questions of partial ijtihad and following a dead scholar.