DraftWritten with AI help from the sources it cites, and not yet read by a human editor.
At a glance
Curriculum expectations
B1.3— explain, with reference to particular works, both historical and contemporary […], how knowledge of an art work’s cultural and historical context, achieved through research, has clarified and enriched their understanding of the work’s intent and meaningB2.2— explain, on the basis of research, ways in which various art works are a response to and a reflection of the society in which they were created […]
Brief
This lesson asks you to explain, from research, how knowing the cultural and historical context of an art work has clarified its meaning, and how works respond to and reflect the society that made them. The museum offers three cases: glass, painting and tile. The research and the comparison with other works come from your class. 1
What did the maker have, and who paid?
List the materials, techniques and patrons each record names. Say which of them you think explains the work best, and what else you would need to find out to be sure.
How does the work reflect its society?
Choose one feature of a work and show what it tells you about the people who made or ordered it. Mark what the record says and what you are inferring.
Go deeper
Follow the changing patron of one studio. Milo Cleveland Beach writes that the emperor Akbar placed the Iranians Mir Sayyid Ali and Abd al-Samad in charge of the painting studios, and that what emerged was a new style mixing Indian and Safavid elements 2. Under Jahangir the work was organised differently: he preferred small books with few, fine illustrations and single pictures for his albums, and discouraged the Akbari division of one picture among a designer, a colourist and a portraitist 3 4. When Aurangzeb withdrew from active patronage in the 1660s, many painters moved to provincial governors and nobles 5.
How do we know?
A name in a record can be a signature, an attribution or an inference. An incised cartouche on the Kaykawus tomb at Sivas gives the master's name as Merendli, and Muhammad al-Majnun is written in tile in the Yesil mosque's royal lodge, which the TDV entry calls the craftsman's signature 6. The work at the Yesil mosque is attributed to Ali ibn Ilyas Ali of Bursa 6. For a painter's patron, Beach only suggests that Dara Shikoh may have patronised the new direction, since so many major works show him 7. The TDV entry does not describe a kiln, a guild or an apprenticeship, and it is about architectural tile, not vessels 6.
Think about it
Jahangir changed how pictures were made, and Ali ibn Ilyas, in the entry's account, learned new techniques at Samarkand. Use the records, and answer the strongest objection to your view: who shapes a work more, the person who pays or the maker who knows the craft?
Into the museum
- Mughal painting: the studios under Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jahan.
- Potter / tilemaker: the makers' names and what the TDV entry says about each.
- Glassmaking in the early Islamic world: the glass industry and the capitals that drew it.
Try this
Read the records on glassmaking in the early Islamic world and Mughal painting. Write a paragraph that explains one work by its patron or its materials, and underline the sentence that comes from the record.
Sources
- Ontario Ministry of Education, The Ontario Curriculum: The Arts
- Milo Cleveland Beach, The Grand Mogul: Imperial Painting in India 1600–1660 (Williamstown, Mass.: Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, 1978) , p. 16
- Milo Cleveland Beach, The Grand Mogul: Imperial Painting in India 1600–1660 (Williamstown, Mass.: Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, 1978) , p. 19
- Milo Cleveland Beach, The Grand Mogul: Imperial Painting in India 1600–1660 (Williamstown, Mass.: Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, 1978) , p. 23
- Milo Cleveland Beach, The Grand Mogul: Imperial Painting in India 1600–1660 (Williamstown, Mass.: Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, 1978) , p. 18
- ÇİNİ (glazed tile) — TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (Şerare Yetkin) , p.329-335
- Milo Cleveland Beach, The Grand Mogul: Imperial Painting in India 1600–1660 (Williamstown, Mass.: Sterling and Francine Clark Art Institute, 1978) , p. 26
Cite this page
islam.museum contributors. “Art and the society that made it”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/course/ca-on-g11-avi3m-b-2/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-13.
Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · Help complete it · JSON