Shi'ism in Syria and Jabal Amil
التشيع في الشام وجبل عامل
Arslan debates whether Shi'ism is older in Syria or in Persia. He reads the Abu Dhar al-Ghifari traditions as evidence of early pro-Ali sentiment in Syria, but does not treat them as enough to explain the origin of Shi'ism in Jabal Amil. He notes that Shi'a there practised taqiyya for long periods, and that many historians named their scholars as Shi'a only reluctantly. He also records that the Jerusalem Islamic Congress was led in prayer by a Shi'i mujtahid. This is his debate with other writers, not a settled historical verdict.
At a glance
- Era
- The Gunpowder Empires
- Review
- Draft Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it
Overview
Shakib Arslan discusses with Ahmad Rida and with the scholars of Tabriz the question of the oldest Shi'ism: was it in Syria or among the non-Arabs? This is a presentation of his own argument, and not a ruling on a historical question that is disputed. 1
His argument
Arslan relates a report that Abu Dhar al-Ghifari was loyal to Ali and that he rebuked Mu'awiya for amassing wealth. He holds that this is enough to prove an early Shi'ism in Syria, but it is not enough by itself, and in his view it cannot be made the basis for Jabal Amil. 1
Dissimulation and the Jerusalem conference
He mentions that the Shi'a of Jabal Amil were bound by dissimulation (taqiyya) in later ages, and that many historians did not attribute their scholars to Shi'ism except under compulsion. He describes the Islamic conference of Jerusalem, saying that its members prayed behind a Shi'i mujtahid. 1
A further source is needed: there is only one source, and the claim of dissimulation and the conference need a second source.
Sources
- Stoddard, Hadir al-ʿalam al-islami (Arabic translation with Arslan's commentary)
Cite this page
islam.museum contributors. “Shi'ism in Syria and Jabal Amil”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/shia-syria-jabal-amil/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Accessed 2026-10-17.