A critic of the philosophers

One critic of the philosophers, Ibn Khaldun, and the arguments he uses (C2.1, C2.2).

Lesson 1 of 1 5 of 6 in the course

Course map

Draft: this lesson was written with AI help and has not yet been read by a human editor.

What your class asks

This lesson asks you to summarise the arguments critics have used against the answers of major philosophers, and to analyse their strengths and weaknesses. The museum sets out one critic's arguments, those of Ibn Khaldun, and none of the philosophers' replies, so your class will need the texts themselves and the other critics. 1

Curriculum expectations, with their official codes

  • C2.1 summarize arguments that critics have used to support, critique, or refute responses of major philosophers or philosophical traditions to some of the big questions of philosophy
  • C2.2 analyse, using their philosophical reasoning skills, the strengths and weaknesses of the main arguments made by major philosophers or philo­sophical traditions in response to some of the big questions of philosophy

The lesson

What does a reply have to do?

Think about what a reply must show to count as an answer to a critic, and what the record lets you say and not say when only one side is given.

How would you weigh an argument whose opponent is absent?

The museum's record of Ibn Khaldun's argument gives none of the philosophers' replies. Ask what you can conclude about an argument when you have heard only one side, and what you would need to find.

Go deeper

Take the argument apart before you judge it. In the Muqaddima, the record of the refutation of philosophy says, Ibn Khaldun describes the followers of philosophy as claiming that all existence, the sensible and what lies beyond it, has its essences and states known through speculative thought and rational syllogisms, and as devising a canon for telling truth from falsehood, which they called logic 2. He then holds that their view is corrupt in several respects. Their attribution of existing things to the First Intellect falls short of what lies beyond it. Their proofs are universal mental judgements, whereas external existing things are individuated by their matter, so there is no certainty that the mental conforms to the external. Questions of natural philosophy do not matter for religion or livelihood 2. Ask of each objection whether it is about what exists, what can be known, or what is useful.

Why they did it

The record preserves no passage in which Ibn Khaldun gives his reasons for the chapter. It says only that he devotes a chapter to refuting philosophy and showing the corruption of those who profess it, and that this is his own view 2. What the records add comes from the Encyclopaedia of Islam, in the record of Ibn Khaldun: the article stresses his distrust of speculative reasoning and says that, after a radical criticism of knowledge, his refutation of philosophy was replaced by an empiricism tied to concrete facts 3. That is the article's reading, not a statement of his.

How do we know?

The chapter reaches the museum as a short summary of one passage of the Muqaddima, and the record states what it lacks: the replies of the philosophers, and the academic view 2. A voice from inside the tradition is found in the record of Ibn Rushd. The Encyclopaedia of Islam says he criticised Ibn Sina's philosophy vigorously while respecting his medical work, and that in the Tahafut he rejects the emanationist principle that the One can give rise only to one 4 5. The records do not say whether this meets Ibn Khaldun's first objection, and do not say that he had Ibn Rushd in view.

Think about it

Which of Ibn Khaldun's three objections is the strongest, and why? Defend your choice against the most serious reply you can build: which part of that reply can the records above not supply?

Into the museum

  • The refutation of philosophy: the chapter as the museum summarises it, with its note on what is missing.
  • Ibn Khaldun: his life and the Encyclopaedia of Islam's account of his method.
  • Ibn Rushd: a philosopher who criticised Ibn Sina, as the Encyclopaedia of Islam reports.

Try this

Read the refutation of philosophy. Write Ibn Khaldun's argument as premises and a conclusion, then name one place where a philosopher might reply.

Carry it further

Where this lesson leads in the museum.

Check yourself

Nothing here is marked or sent anywhere. It is for you.

Which of these did you meet in this lesson?

Not in this lesson. Look again at the cards above.

Not in this lesson. Look again at the cards above.

Yes. That is the one from this lesson.

In your own words: what does The refutation of philosophy have to do with this lesson?

Compare with the card

Ibn Khaldun's three arguments. In the Muqaddima Ibn Khaldun argues against the philosophers. He holds that their attribution of existing things to the First Intellect falls short of what lies beyond it, that their universal mental proofs give no certainty about individuated external things, and that natural philosophy does not matter for religion or livelihood. The museum's record gives none of the philosophers' replies. Which argument is strongest?

I can now

Notes

  1. 1. Ontario Ministry of Education, The Ontario Curriculum: Social Sciences and Humanities
  2. 2. Muqaddimat Ibn Khaldun, p.548-549
  3. 3. Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition (Leiden: Brill, 1954–2008), 13 volumes, vol. 3 p. 862
  4. 4. Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition (Leiden: Brill, 1954–2008), 13 volumes, vol. 3 p. 943
  5. 5. Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition (Leiden: Brill, 1954–2008), 13 volumes, vol. 3 p. 947
Use the arrow keys or the buttons. Esc leaves.