What pulls, and what holds?

An example of a force, the Earth's attraction of objects as one medieval author explained it, and what forces do to motion (C3.1).

Lesson 1 of 1 4 of 5 in the course

Course map

Draft: this lesson was written with AI help and has not yet been read by a human editor.

What your class asks

This lesson asks you to give examples of different forces and to describe the effect of each on an object's velocity. The museum offers one historical description of attraction, a medieval author's explanation of why objects fall towards the Earth. Friction, normal force and the effects on velocity are for your class to bring. 1

Curriculum expectations, with their official codes

  • C3.1 distinguish between, and provide examples of, different forces […], and describe the effect of each type of force on the velocity of an object

Before you start

A thought to carry into the lesson.

The lesson

Which force is acting, and on what?

Look at the expectation: it asks for examples of forces and their effect on velocity. For the description, ask what is pulling, what is being pulled, and whether it says anything about the object's speed or direction.

Go deeper

Read one comparison in a preface. TDV records a physical explanation in al-Idrisi's preface: he compares the earth's attraction of objects with a magnet attracting iron, explaining why airborne objects fall towards the earth 2. The book itself begins with the shape of the earth. The earth, al-Idrisi writes, is round like a ball, with the water clinging to it, and earth and water rest in the middle of the heavens like the yolk in an egg 3. The museum attributes the magnet analogy to him rather than presenting a modern gravitational law or experimental discovery 2. The comparison is part of the explanation of the world that comes before the book's maps and distances 2.

Why they did it

Al-Idrisi's preface tells the story of the work as the story of the king. Roger, he writes, was learned in the mathematical sciences, and when his realm had grown he wanted to know its lands with certainty 4. The books did not satisfy him, so he questioned those who knew the subject and then the travellers, keeping what they agreed on and setting aside what they disputed, for about fifteen years 5. In the preface it is Roger who drives the inquiry, and al-Idrisi presents himself as the one who carried out his order 6. The records give no purpose of al-Idrisi's own beyond that order.

Often misunderstood

A comparison is not a law. The museum attributes the magnet analogy to al-Idrisi and does not present it as a modern gravitational law or an experimental discovery 2. The record adds a second caution: a spherical earth and a correct distribution of climates and habitation are separate claims, and accepting the former does not make every regional description accurate 2.

How do we know?

In the record, the magnet comparison rests on TDV's reading of the preface, while the story of Roger's inquiry and the shape of the earth come from the Arabic preface, in the Cairo edition of 2002 2 7. TDV also notes the limits of the book: its reports on the lands of the Turks are fuller than those of earlier geographers but at times blurred by legend 8. The sources read for the record say nothing of what became of the silver disc. Ask which statements about the falling of objects you could check in al-Idrisi's own words, and which you receive through a summary.

Think about it

Does comparing the earth's pull to a magnet's pull explain why objects fall, or only name it, and what does the comparison leave unsaid about how a falling object's speed or direction changes?

Into the museum

Try this

Read the record of al-Idrisi's world map and book. Name the force described and draw an arrow for it on a sketch of a falling object, then add what the record does not say: how the speed or direction changes.

Check yourself

Nothing here is marked or sent anywhere. It is for you.

Which of these did you meet in this lesson?

Not in this lesson. Look again at the cards above.

Not in this lesson. Look again at the cards above.

Yes. That is the one from this lesson.

In your own words: what does Al-Idrisi's world map and the Book of Roger (Tabula Rogeriana) have to do with this lesson?

Compare with the card

A magnet and the fall of objects. TDV records a physical explanation in the preface of al-Idrisi's book: he compares the Earth's attraction of objects with a magnet attracting iron, to explain why objects in the air fall towards the Earth. The museum attributes this analogy to him; it does not present a modern law of gravitation or an experimental discovery. The record says nothing about the speed or direction of the falling object. What pulls an object, and what does the pull change?

I can now

Notes

  1. 1. Ontario Ministry of Education, The Ontario Curriculum: Science
  2. 2. İDRÎSÎ, Şerîf — TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (Ramazan Şeşen), pp.493–495
  3. 3. Al-Idrisi, Nuzhat al-Mushtaq fi ikhtiraq al-afaq (Cairo: Maktabat al-Thaqafa al-Diniyya, 2002), 2 vols., p. 7
  4. 4. Al-Idrisi, Nuzhat al-Mushtaq fi ikhtiraq al-afaq (Cairo: Maktabat al-Thaqafa al-Diniyya, 2002), 2 vols., p. 5
  5. 5. Al-Idrisi, Nuzhat al-Mushtaq fi ikhtiraq al-afaq (Cairo: Maktabat al-Thaqafa al-Diniyya, 2002), 2 vols., p. 6
  6. 6. Al-Idrisi, Nuzhat al-Mushtaq fi ikhtiraq al-afaq (Cairo: Maktabat al-Thaqafa al-Diniyya, 2002), 2 vols., pp. 5–7
  7. 7. Al-Idrisi, Nuzhat al-Mushtaq fi ikhtiraq al-afaq (Cairo: Maktabat al-Thaqafa al-Diniyya, 2002), 2 vols., pp. 3–14
  8. 8. İDRÎSÎ, Şerîf — TDV İslâm Ansiklopedisi (Ramazan Şeşen), pp. 493–495
Use the arrow keys or the buttons. Esc leaves.