Wiping only over the headscarf in ablution

By Nazir Ayyad

حكم الاقتصار على المسح فوق الخمار في الوضوء

A question about a woman who finds it hard at work to remove her headscarf for ablution and asks whether she may wipe over it instead of wiping her head; Dar al-Ifta al-Misriyya answered that the obligatory minimum in wiping the head is conveying moisture to any part of it, however small, even a single hair or part of one, which a woman can do by wiping the front of her head from under her scarf, so she should not be content with wiping over the scarf but should wipe the hair itself as far as she can; if she places her wet hand on the scarf and the moisture reaches the hair, that suffices and her ablution is valid. Dar al-Ifta set out the jurists' consensus that wiping the head is an essential element of ablution while they differ on the obligatory amount, that the fatwa follows the Shafi'i view that wiping part of the hair within the bounds of the head suffices, and that wiping only over the scarf does not make ablution valid according to the Hanafis, Malikis, Hanbalis in one report and a group of early scholars, because the commanded wiping is not achieved and because a scarf is not hard to remove, like a cap; the Shafi'is agree when the moisture does not reach the hair. It cited Aisha's practice of putting her hand under her wrap, then noted that the Hanbali school proper and Ibn Hazm allow wiping over the scarf on the strength of Bilal's hadith on wiping over the khuffs and the khimar and the practice of Umm Salama and al-Hasan, on condition that it is wound under the throat, worn in a state of full purity, and within the period allowed for wiping over khuffs.

Depth

At a glance

Review
Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Summary

A question about a woman who finds it hard at work to remove her headscarf for ablution, in which Dar al-Ifta al-Misriyya answered that the obligation is to convey moisture to any part of the head, even a single hair, which she can do by wiping the front of her head from under the scarf; she should not be content with wiping over the scarf unless the moisture passes through it to the hair, in which case it suffices, and it set out the schools' disagreement on wiping over the scarf. 1

The question

The questioner asked about a woman at work who finds it hard to remove her headscarf when performing ablution: may she wipe over it instead of wiping her head? 1

The answer

Dar al-Ifta began with the jurists' consensus that wiping the head is, in general, an essential element of ablution by the text of al-Ma'ida 6, quoting Ibn Abd al-Barr in al-Tamhid (4/31) on their agreement that wiping the head is obligatory, and Ibn Qudama in al-Mughni (1/92) that there is no disagreement on it. 1 It then noted that the jurists differ on the amount that must be wiped, and that the fatwa follows the Shafi'i view that wiping is achieved by passing a wet hand over part of the head, even one hair or part of one within its bounds, while wiping hair that hangs below the head does not suffice, as al-Khatib al-Shirbini says in Mughni al-Muhtaj (1/176). 1

It ruled that wiping only over the scarf does not make ablution valid according to the Hanafis, the Malikis and the Hanbalis in one report, this being also the view of Nafi, al-Nakha'i, Hammad ibn Abi Sulayman, al-Awza'i and Sa'id ibn Abd al-Aziz, because the commanded wiping of the head is not achieved and because a scarf, like a cap, is not normally hard to remove; the Shafi'is agree when the moisture of the hand does not reach the hair, but if the woman places her wet hand on the scarf and the moisture reaches the hair, that suffices on the correct view. 1 It cited al-Sarakhsi in al-Mabsut (1/101) that a woman does not wipe over her scarf; al-Mudawwana (1/124) that a woman who wiped over her scarf repeats her prayer and ablution; al-Nawawi in al-Majmu' (1/409) reporting al-Shafi'i's words in al-Buwayti that she puts her hand under her scarf so that the wiping falls on the hair, and that the correct view is sufficiency when the moisture reaches it; and Ibn Qudama in al-Mughni (1/222) on the two Hanbali reports and Ahmad's statement that she wipes from under the scarf. 1 It said that a woman who finds it hard in her workplace to remove her covering may content herself with wiping the front of her head from under the scarf as far as her hand reaches, which is what Aisha used to do, putting her hand under her wrap, as al-Bayhaqi records in al-Sunan al-Kubra, and what Abd al-Rahman ibn Abi Layla and Ata said, as reported by Ibn al-Mundhir in al-Awsat (1/470). 1

Dar al-Ifta then noted that the Hanbali school proper and Ibn Hazm allow wiping over the scarf, the basis being the hadith of Bilal in Sahih Muslim that the Prophet ﷺ wiped over the khuffs and the khimar, meaning the turban; it quoted Ibn Muflih in al-Furu' (1/204) that a woman wipes her head-covering wound under the throat, and Ibn Hazm in al-Muhalla (1/303) that wiping over anything worn on the head suffices, and noted that this is reported from Umm Salama in Ibn Abi Shayba's Musannaf and from al-Hasan. 1 It explained that those who hold it valid require the scarf to be wound under the throat and worn in a state of full purity with water, within the period for wiping over khuffs, a day and a night for the resident and three days for the traveller, as in Shams al-Din ibn Qudama's al-Sharh al-Kabir (1/168) and al-Buhuti's Kashshaf al-Qina' (1/113), which supports the condition of purity with the hadiths of Abu Bakra and al-Mughira ibn Shu'ba, and that in this they agree with the position of Abu Thawr, as in al-Muhalla (1/309). 1

Dar al-Ifta concluded that the obligatory minimum in wiping the head is conveying moisture to any part of it, however small, which a woman can do by wiping the front of her head from under her scarf; she should not be content with wiping over the scarf but should wipe the hair itself as far as she can, and if she places her wet hand on the scarf and the moisture reaches the hair, that suffices and her ablution is valid. 1

About this record

Dar al-Ifta al-Misriyya published this fatwa on dar-alifta.org as no. 9011, dated 4 July 2026, in the category of purity, among the fatwas of the Grand Mufti Nazir Muhammad Ayyad. 1 The museum records this text as a historical document attributed to the body or scholar that issued it; it issues no ruling of its own.

Connections

Explore the connections

About
Wudu (ablution)· Wudu' (ablution, fiqh)· Khimar (women's head covering in fiqh)

People and things also explored

Does anaesthesia break ablution?· Muwatta 32· Muwatta 33· Muwatta 34· Muwatta 35· Muwatta 36· Muwatta 38· Muwatta 39

Sources

  1. Egypt's Dar al-Ifta (dar-alifta.org) , fatwa 9011

Original page

Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Wiping only over the headscarf in ablution”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/work/fatwa-dar-alifta-wiping-over-the-headscarf-in-wudu/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-02.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Words

Qur'an, hadith, poetry, and the languages and scripts of Muslim peoples.
Related

Does anaesthesia break ablution?

A question about a patient about to undergo surgery under anaesthesia, asking whether general or partial anaesthesia breaks his ablution; Dar al-Ifta al-Misriyya answered that both general and partial anaesthesia break ablution in sharia, because each creates a likelihood that something invalidating passes from the body without awareness. Dar al-Ifta defined anaesthesia from Kashshaf Istilahat al-Funun, al-Mu'jam al-Wasit and the medical glossary of the Arabic Language Academy, dividing it into general, spinal and local; it explained that loss of reason in any form breaks ablution by the consensus reported by Ibn al-Mundhir, that Ibn Qudama counted drugs that remove reason as invalidating by consensus because such people's senses are further gone than a sleeper's, and that al-Nawawi stated that loss of reason through banj or medicine breaks ablution. It ruled that general anaesthesia breaks ablution as it removes reason, and that spinal anaesthesia, though it does not remove reason, removes control of and sensation in the limbs from the navel down, including the two passages, so it creates a likelihood of something invalidating passing; it cited the hadith that the eyes are the drawstring of the anus and the hadith on the relaxing of the joints, and the principle that sleep was made an invalidator only because it makes such a passage likely, the cause being put in place of the effect, as al-Munawi, al-Shurunbulali and Ali al-Qari explain.