At a glance
Contested: This record includes matters on which scholars differ. The speaker's views are labelled as his, and other views are marked where no cited source yet exists.
Development of law, theology and institutions
Summary
One of the questions of legal theory on which Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya writes at length in I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in is whether a Companion's opinion is a proof. He gives many arguments that following the Companions is obligatory, and reports the view of those who do not hold it to be a proof. 1 2
Ibn al-Qayyim's position
His twenty-fourth argument is the report of Hudhayfa, narrated by al-Tirmidhi, about following Abu Bakr and Umar. 1 He states that the Companions' interpretation of the Qur'an comes before every other in all kinds of interpretation. They knew the Arabs' language best, he says, witnessed the revelation and knew its circumstances. 3 He explains that those who hold a Companion's opinion to be a proof order the proofs as the Qur'an, then the Sunna, then the Companion's opinion, then analogy. For them a Companion's opinion is stronger than an analogy that contradicts it. 2 4
The Successor
He discusses whether a Successor's opinion is a proof when no Companion or Successor contradicts it. His answer is that the Successors were spread so widely that one can hardly be confident no one disagreed. He notes that some Hanbalis and Shafi'is held that such an opinion should be followed, and that al-Shafi'i said in one place that he held a view in deference to Ata. Most scholars, he adds, distinguish between Companion and Successor, and two narrations are reported from Ahmad on using a Successor's interpretation as proof. 3
The other position, as he reports it
Ibn al-Qayyim reports that those who say a Companion's opinion is not a proof hold two views when it goes against analogy. One is that it is all the more not a proof, since it contradicts a legal proof. The other is that in that case it is a proof, on the assumption that the Companion said it on the basis of something he learned from the Prophet ﷺ, so that it is like a mursal report acted on by the one who narrated it. 2
Not covered here
The holders of the view that it is not a proof have not yet been added by name, with their arguments from the books of legal theory. Ibn al-Qayyim's earlier arguments, in the preceding volume, have not been added either.
Opinions on the question
First opinion · Sunni tradition (the museum's frame) · Sunni (Hanbali)Main reference
Held by: Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya
Basis: Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin, vol. 6 (Dar Ibn al-Jawzi, 1423 AH)
More opinions (1)
Sunni tradition (the museum's frame)Secondary opinion
Basis: Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin, vol. 6 (Dar Ibn al-Jawzi, 1423 AH)
People and things also explored
Justice and uprightness (adl)· Contagion (adwa)· Pardon (afw) in purity, worship, contracts and penalties· Covenant (ahd) and the duty to keep it; oath by the covenant of God· Term, deadline (ajal)· The five necessities (al-daruriyyat al-khams)· Unattested interest (al-maslaha al-mursala, istislah)· Action (amal) and the five rulings that govern it
Sources
- Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin, vol. 6 (Dar Ibn al-Jawzi, 1423 AH) , p. 5
- Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin, vol. 6 (Dar Ibn al-Jawzi, 1423 AH) , p. 39
- Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin, vol. 6 (Dar Ibn al-Jawzi, 1423 AH) , p. 38
- Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, I'lam al-Muwaqqi'in 'an Rabb al-'Alamin, vol. 6 (Dar Ibn al-Jawzi, 1423 AH) , p. 40
Cite this page
islam.museum contributors. “Is a Companion's opinion a legal proof?”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/questions/is-a-companions-opinion-a-legal-proof/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-04.
Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · Help complete it · JSON