At a glance
Summary
Problem and achievement
The sources connect the work with a cubic reduction involving a number and a square. Al-Mahani did not solve it; al-Khazin later solved the equation using conics. The commentary does not become a general cubic-solution manual, and the importance assigned to formulation in Khayyam's reported account does not supply a missing final success 2 3.
The invention article supplies a modern volume derivation and independent examples, not the original text or a complete recovery of its proof order. We have not examined al-Mahani's reasoning line by line or discovered our5/32 example in a copyist's manuscript 4.
Witnesses and attribution limits
TDV reports Leiden remains and a commentary by al-Quhi; Dold-Samplonius qualifies the commentator as probably al-Quhi. That qualification remains, and a work fragment is not equated with a complete later commentary. Multiple reference descriptions are not a museum manuscript catalogue based on fresh inspection 1 3.
Dating remains the ninth-century lifetime horizon, not an eclipse observation or a newly found completion signature. The accounts read here establish no precise composition day. The biographies, work list and DSB reproduction were read, not the Leiden fragment, al-Mahani's original or all the editions listed in their bibliographies 5 6.
Connections
People and things also explored
Khayyam's geometric solutions of cubic equations· Al Mahani· Al-Mahani's cubic reduction of sphere division
Sources
- Fazlıoğlu: al-Mahani in TDV , work5
- MacTutor: al-Mahani , cubic
- Dold-Samplonius: al-Mahani , cubic
- Weisstein: Spherical Cap , eq6
- MacTutor: al-Mahani , biography-and-bibliography
- Fazlıoğlu: al-Mahani in TDV , bibliography
Cite this page
islam.museum contributors. “Al-Mahani's Sphere and Cylinder commentary”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/work/mahani-sphere-cylinder-commentary/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-06.
Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · Help complete it · JSON