Compulsion (ikrah)

الإكراه

Compulsion in Ibn Abbas's hadith — the thirty-ninth of the Forty — is the third thing God lifted from the community: 'and what they were coerced into' — another's forcing one, by credible threat, into a deed or utterance; its rulings in the commentary differ by subject: in the word of unbelief it was excepted by His saying 'except one compelled while his heart is at rest in faith', and in transactions and utterances it affects validity and bindingness, the unifying principle being that compulsion removes deliberate assent so the ruling does not settle upon its subject as it settles on the willing actor (Jami' al-Ulum wal-Hikam p. 796).

Depth

At a glance

Era
The Prophetic Era
Region
Global / Diaspora
Review
Draft Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

Law and courts

The long-form text for this entry has not been written yet. The facts and connections below come from the museum's data.

Connections

Explore the connections

Based on
Arba'un 39 — God pardoned my community error and forgetfulness
Part of
Error and forgetfulness

People and things also explored

Error and forgetfulness· Arba'un 39 — God pardoned my community error and forgetfulness· Abdullah ibn Abbas· Sale of the prohibited· Burden of proof and oath· The sanctity of a Muslim's blood· The science of inheritance shares· The no-harm maxim

Sources

  • Jami' al-Ulum wal-Hikam — Ibn Rajab al-Hanbali
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Compulsion (ikrah)”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/ikrah/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Accessed 2026-10-13.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Ideas

Beliefs, concepts, sciences and schools, explained in plain words.
Related

Error and forgetfulness

Error and forgetfulness in Ibn Abbas's hadith — the thirty-ninth of the Forty — are among what God lifted from this community: 'God has pardoned for my sake on behalf of my community error, forgetfulness, and what they were coerced into' — error being the doing of the prohibited without intent, and forgetfulness the omitting of a command or doing of a prohibition through the heart's heedlessness, both lifting accountability on the commentators' prevailing reading since culpable intent is absent, while worldly consequences may still attach to error, such as the blood-money and expiation rulings for accidental killing (Jami' al-Ulum wal-Hikam pp. 796–797).