Greek traditions reach Arabic

How the traditions of Plato and Aristotle came to readers of Arabic (B2.1).

Lesson 2 of 4 2 of 6 in the course

Course map

Draft: this lesson was written with AI help and has not yet been read by a human editor.

What your class asks

This lesson asks you to describe some major philosophical traditions and to explain how they approach the big questions. The museum shows how two Greek traditions, that of Plato and that of Aristotle, came to readers of Arabic, through the Neoplatonists and through Arabic interpreters. It does not set out how each tradition approaches the big questions, so your class will add the explanation and the other traditions. 1

Curriculum expectations, with their official codes

  • B2.1 describe some major philosophical traditions […], and explain how these traditions approach the big questions of philosophy

Before you start

A thought to carry into the lesson.

The lesson

How does a tradition travel?

Compare how the two records say the Greek tradition reached Arabic readers: through intermediaries and through commentators. Ask which of these could change what a tradition says.

Go deeper

Read how one Arabic author handles a Greek authority. In Kitab al-Hayawan, al-Jahiz often quotes Aristotle, whom he calls "the master of logic" 2 3. Discussing the lion, he takes from him that the cure for its bite is the cure for a dog's bite, and builds on this the points of likeness between dog and lion 2. On hens he reports from him that one hen laid eighteen eggs, each with two yolks, and that two chicks hatched from each egg 4. He does not always defer: where Aristotle claims that seeing an eagle's chick is a hard thing, al-Jahiz says "I am not able to judge between them" and turns to what he knows of the crows of Basra 5. Notice three moves with one authority: he quotes it, builds on it, and says where he cannot judge it.

Often misunderstood

The Encyclopaedia of Islam keeps apart two things that are easy to run together. The Arabic bibliographers list all the dialogues of the Greek corpus, but no Arabic translation of a dialogue has been traced 6. What reached Arab authors, it says, was Plato read through the Neoplatonists Plotinus, Porphyry and Proclus, Galen's summary of the Timaeus, which came through Hunayn b. Ishaq, and the arrangement of the dialogues, which al-Farabi used and partly reproduced 7. The article adds that Plato was also made the author of alchemical and magical works 6. In the article's account, then, a list of titles is one thing and what was translated another.

How do we know?

Ask of each witness how far it stands from Plato's own words. The Encyclopaedia of Islam says the Arabic lives of Plato add little to the Greek tradition, and that the principal collection of his sayings is Hunayn's Nawadir al-falasifa 6. Ibn al-Nadim, citing the book of Plutarch, gives his life, and the source differs on his age: eighty-one years, or eighty in Ishaq's report 8. Al-Mas'udi relates that on the gate of the Sabian assembly at Harran there was written in Syriac: "Whoever knows himself becomes divine" 9. That is a saying known through one author's report of an inscription.

Think about it

Al-Jahiz weighs Aristotle on a claim about eagles, while the Arabic lives of Plato add little to the Greek ones. Which of these two ways of receiving a tradition gives a reader more reason to trust what it passes on, and why?

Into the museum

  • Plato: his life in Ibn al-Nadim and the Encyclopaedia of Islam, and what is known of how his works reached Arabic.
  • Aristotle: the interpreters Ibn al-Nadim names, and the passages al-Jahiz draws from him.
  • Kitab al-Hayawan: al-Jahiz's book, where the quotations above are found.

Try this

Read Aristotle and list the interpreters Ibn al-Nadim names. Then read Plato and note what the Encyclopaedia of Islam says about Arabic translations of his dialogues.

Check yourself

Nothing here is marked or sent anywhere. It is for you.

Which of these did you meet in this lesson?

Not in this lesson. Look again at the cards above.

Not in this lesson. Look again at the cards above.

Yes. That is the one from this lesson.

In your own words: what does Plato (Aflatun) have to do with this lesson?

Compare with the card

Plato read through the Neoplatonists. The Encyclopaedia of Islam says most Arab thinkers subordinated Plato to Aristotle but recognised a common purpose between the two, and read him through the Neoplatonists Plotinus, Porphyry and Proclus. It adds that no Arabic translation of a dialogue has been traced. How does a tradition travel when its main texts do not?

In your own words: what does Aristutalis have to do with this lesson?

Compare with the card

Aristotle and his Arabic interpreters. Ibn al-Nadim says Aristotle, son of Nicomachus, took from Plato and succeeded him, and that his books on logic, natural science and theology were translated into Arabic. They were interpreted, he says, by Alexander of Aphrodisias, Themistius, Yahya al-Nahwi, al-Farabi, al-Kindi and others. Where would a student of this tradition look for its Arabic voices?

I can now

Notes

  1. 1. Ontario Ministry of Education, The Ontario Curriculum: Social Sciences and Humanities
  2. 2. al-Jahiz, Kitab al-Hayawan, vol. 1 (Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyya, Beirut 2003, notes by Muhammad Basil 'Uyun al-Sud), p. 283
  3. 3. al-Jahiz, Kitab al-Hayawan, vol. 2 (Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyya, Beirut 2003, notes by Muhammad Basil 'Uyun al-Sud), p. 70
  4. 4. al-Jahiz, Kitab al-Hayawan, vol. 2 (Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyya, Beirut 2003, notes by Muhammad Basil 'Uyun al-Sud), p. 89
  5. 5. al-Jahiz, Kitab al-Hayawan, vol. 1 (Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyya, Beirut 2003, notes by Muhammad Basil 'Uyun al-Sud), p. 420
  6. 6. Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition (Leiden: Brill, 1954–2008), 13 volumes, vol. 1 p. 257
  7. 7. Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition (Leiden: Brill, 1954–2008), 13 volumes, vol. 1 p. 256
  8. 8. al-Fihrist of Ibn al-Nadim, p.343-344
  9. 9. Muruj al-Dhahab — al-Masʼudi, p.542-547
Use the arrow keys or the buttons. Esc leaves.