Draft: this lesson was written with AI help and has not yet been read by a human editor.
1 What your class asks
This lesson asks you to evaluate food-distribution systems by their impact on local and global food security. The museum offers one legal answer on one practice, withholding food to wait for higher prices; the systems themselves, such as fair trade and local versus imported food, are for your class to bring and evaluate. The record is a ruling on one practice, not a system. 1
Curriculum expectations, with their official codes
- D1.4 evaluate various food-distribution systems in terms of their impact on local and global food security […]
2 The lesson
Who gains and who loses when food is held back?
Identify who holds the food, who needs it and when. Ask which part of food security, availability or access, the practice changes, and what evidence your class would need to measure it.
Go deeper
Read how one answer is built. A food trader asked Jordan's General Iftaa Department about merchants who withhold goods because they know prices will rise soon 2. The Department answered that the sharia forbids hoarding because it harms people, defining it as holding what was bought at a time of high prices to sell it dearer when need is acute 2. It said hoarding covers all goods people need if withholding them harms people, the Maliki view and that of Abu Yusuf among the Hanafis, quoting Ibn Rushd al-Jadd's al-Bayan wa-l-Tahsil and al-Kasani's Bada'i al-Sana'i 2. It said hoarding staple foods is more gravely forbidden, quoting Zakariyya al-Ansari's Asna al-Matalib that it is forbidden because it straitens people, Ibn Hajar al-Haytami's al-Zawajir counting it among the major sins, and his report that al-Ghazali extended staples to what supports them, such as meat and fruit 2. The Department published the fatwa as no. 3856, dated 7 March 2024 2. The answer gives harm to people as its reason and rests on jurists it names.
How do we know?
A fatwa is an answer a body published to a question, so it witnesses what the Department answered 2; the museum records it as a document attributed to the body that issued it, and issues no ruling 2. The Department quotes jurists and books by name, and the record does not print those texts. In the record of hoarding al-Maraghi defines it as withholding goods to shrink supply, raise prices and let the hoarder dictate sales 3, and cites the hadith "whoever hoards is a sinner" while noting in the margin that some of the chapter's wording is weak 3. Neither record names a merchant who hoarded or a penalty that fell on one; both witness what was ruled, not what happened in markets.
Think about it
The Department defines hoarding as holding what was bought at a time of high prices to sell it dearer when need is acute 2; al-Maraghi defines it as withholding goods to shrink supply, raise prices and let the hoarder dictate sales 3. Which definition would be easier for an official to apply to a particular merchant, and why?
Into the museum
- Withholding food to wait for higher prices: the question, the answer and the jurists the Department quotes.
- Hoarding (ihtikar): al-Maraghi's definition and what he reports from Ibn Hajar al-Haytami and Abu Yusuf.
- Shirb (the right to water): another rule on what an owner of water may and may not refuse to others.
Try this
Read withholding food to wait for higher prices. Write the definition it gives, then list two other ways food reaches people, and one question about each that your class could research.
3 Check yourself
Nothing here is marked or sent anywhere. It is for you.
In your own words: what does Withholding food to wait for higher prices have to do with this lesson?
Compare with the card
Holding back goods until prices rise. A food trader asked Jordan's General Iftaa Department about merchants who withhold goods expecting prices to rise. The Department answered that hoarding is forbidden because it harms people, defining it as holding what was bought at a time of high prices to sell it dearer when need is acute, and that it is more gravely forbidden for staple foods. The museum records this as a document and issues no ruling. How does withholding food change who can reach it?
I can now