Is the printed Futuh al-Sham the work of al-Waqidi?

Words Ideas

هل «فتوح الشام» المطبوع من تأليف الواقدي؟

The Futuh al-Sham is printed under the name of al-Waqidi (d. 207 AH), and the editor of the Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya edition identifies it with the Futuh al-Sham that Ibn al-Nadim lists among his works; its text quotes al-Mas'udi, al-Tabari, Ibn Khallikan and Dhu al-Nun al-Misri and records later readings of the book; an academic study holds that it is at root al-Waqidi's but was redacted between the 12th and 13th centuries CE.

Depth

At a glance

History-writing and social thoughtConquest and its debates

Summary

The Futuh al-Sham circulates under the name of al-Waqidi (d. 207 AH). The question is whether the whole printed text is his. This entry sets out what the edition says, what academic research says, and the marks within the text itself, without a verdict.

What the edition says

The title page of the Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya edition (Beirut 1997) reads "by Abu Abd Allah Muhammad ibn Umar ibn Waqid al-Waqidi, d. 207 AH". 1 In the introduction the editor Abd al-Latif Abd al-Rahman lists al-Waqidi's works after Ibn al-Nadim's al-Fihrist, among them "Kitab Futuh al-Sham", commenting: "and it is the one before us". The edition does not discuss the book's manuscripts or the later names that appear in it. 2

What academic research says

Yoones Dehghani Farsani, in his Göttingen dissertation, notes that the book has been considered a forgery for more than two centuries, and argues that it is essentially al-Waqidi's original Futuh al-Sham, later changed in form and partly in content in a redaction probably made between the 12th and 13th centuries CE, so that not all of it can be ascribed to al-Waqidi. His evidence is that Ibn Asakir (1106-1175) quotes the original in a form, and partly with a content, different from the present text, and that the oldest known manuscript was copied in 678/1279; he suggests the redaction may have served religious aims during the Crusades, in Egypt or Syria under the Ayyubids. 3

What the text itself contains

  • In the Jerusalem account "al-Waqidi" says they used to read the Futuh at the tomb of Abu Hanifa before Ubada ibn Awf al-Dinawari, and then attaches to the book a rhymed passage Ubada composed on Umar's renunciation. 4 5
  • In the al-Bahnasa account it names its authorities: al-Mas'udi, "Abu Ja'far al-Tabarani", al-Waqidi, Ibn Ishaq and Ibn Hisham, and then "Ibn Khallikan in the history al-Bidaya wa-l-nihaya". 6 7
  • A narrator who calls himself Abu Abd Allah Muhammad ibn al-Muhaddith al-Misri introduces the al-Bahnasa account, saying he found additions and omissions in the books of conquests and selected "this book" after visiting the al-Bahnasa cemetery. 7 8
  • It contains a note on Abu Muhammad al-Hasani reading "these Futuh" in the Ghazzi Umari mosque before a shaykh who corrected his account of how the gate of al-Bahnasa was opened. 9
  • It closes with a dream of Dhu al-Nun al-Misri about the martyrs of al-Bahnasa, 10 and Dhu al-Nun was brought before al-Mutawakkil, after al-Waqidi's time. 11

These marks fit the view of a later redaction, and do not by themselves settle whether an original of al-Waqidi's lies within the book.

Opinions on the question

The question: The ascription of the book to its author, and the distinction between a possible original and later additions.

First opinion · Sunni tradition (the museum's frame)Main reference

The book is al-Waqidi's, as the edition presents it

The edition's title page reads 'by Abu Abd Allah Muhammad ibn Umar ibn Waqid al-Waqidi, d. 207 AH', and the introduction by its editor Abd al-Latif Abd al-Rahman lists al-Waqidi's works from Ibn al-Nadim's al-Fihrist, among them 'Kitab Futuh al-Sham', with the comment: 'and it is the one before us'. The edition does not discuss the manuscripts or the later names in the text.
More opinions (1)

Academic viewSecondary opinion

At root al-Waqidi's, redacted in the 12th-13th centuries CE

Yoones Dehghani Farsani (Göttingen dissertation) notes that the book has been considered a forgery for more than two centuries, and argues that it is essentially al-Waqidi's original Futuh al-Sham, changed in form and partly in content in a later redaction, probably between the 12th and 13th centuries CE, since Ibn Asakir's quotations from the original differ from the present text and the oldest known manuscript was copied in 678/1279; he suggests the redaction may have served religious aims during the Crusades, in Egypt or Syria.

Connections

Explore the connections

Related to
The conquest of Damietta and Tinnis as told in the Futuh al-Sham ascribed to al-Waqidi

People and things also explored

Shata son of al-Bamrak, of Damietta· The conquest of Damietta and Tinnis as told in the Futuh al-Sham ascribed to al-Waqidi· Conquest of Egypt and Alexandria· al-Miqdad ibn Amr· Amr ibn al-As· Dirar ibn al-Azwar al-Asadi· Umar ibn al-Khattab· Damietta

Sources

  1. Futuh al-Sham ascribed to al-Waqidi — vol. 1 (Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, 1997) , p.1
  2. Futuh al-Sham ascribed to al-Waqidi — vol. 1 (Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, 1997) , p.4
  3. Text und Kontext des al-Wāqidī zugeschriebenen Futūḥ aš-Šām (doctoral dissertation, Yoones Dehghani Farsani, University of Göttingen) , abstract
  4. Futuh al-Sham ascribed to al-Waqidi — vol. 1 (Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, 1997) , p.231
  5. Futuh al-Sham ascribed to al-Waqidi — vol. 1 (Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, 1997) , p.232
  6. Futuh al-Sham ascribed to al-Waqidi — vol. 2 (Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, 1997) , p.200
  7. Futuh al-Sham ascribed to al-Waqidi — vol. 2 (Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, 1997) , p.203
  8. Futuh al-Sham ascribed to al-Waqidi — vol. 2 (Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, 1997) , p.204
  9. Futuh al-Sham ascribed to al-Waqidi — vol. 2 (Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, 1997) , p.283
  10. Futuh al-Sham ascribed to al-Waqidi — vol. 2 (Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, 1997) , p.291
  11. Tarikh al-Khulafa — al-Suyuti (Dar al-Minhaj edition) , p. 543
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Is the printed Futuh al-Sham the work of al-Waqidi?”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/questions/attribution-of-futuh-al-sham-waqidi/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-06.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · Help complete it · JSON

Wing

Words

Qur'an, hadith, poetry, and the languages and scripts of Muslim peoples.
Related

Shata son of al-Bamrak, of Damietta

Shata, son of al-Bamrak, lord of Damietta and uncle of the Muqawqis, as the Futuh al-Sham ascribed to al-Waqidi names him. The book relates that he embraced Islam when the Companions entered Damietta, after a vision, followed by a thousand of his men and then by his father; that he went as envoy to Abu Thawb, lord of Tinnis, and was killed fighting him on the night of mid-Sha'ban 20 AH; and that he was buried where he fell, the night becoming a yearly season for visiting his grave.