May one hunt with trained animals other than dogs?

هل يُصاد بالجوارح غير الكلاب؟

A question from the book of hunting reported by Ibn Rushd: all agree on hunting with trained dogs, some disliked the jet-black dog, and they differed over trained beasts and birds other than the dog. Malik, his followers and the jurists of the great cities allowed everything that accepts training, a view reported from Ibn Abbas; a group including Mujahid said there is no hunting with anything but the dog except what is caught alive and slaughtered; and some excepted the goshawk alone.

Depth

At a glance

Law and courts

Summary

In the book of hunting in Bidayat al-Mujtahid, Ibn Rushd discusses the hunting animal, saying that agreement and disagreement about it concern partly the kind of animal and partly the conditions. 1 The kind agreed upon is the dog; disputed are trained beasts and birds of prey other than the dog. 1 2

The jet-black dog

Ibn Rushd notes that some disliked hunting with the black dog, among them al-Hasan al-Basri, Ibrahim al-Nakha'i and Qatada, and that Ahmad said he knew no one who allowed it when it was entirely black, as did Ishaq; the majority allow its game if it is trained. 1 2 He traces this disagreement to analogy conflicting with general wording: the general wording of the verse on trained hunting animals puts all dogs on a par, while the command to kill the jet-black dog implies by analogy that hunting with it is not allowed, for those who hold that a prohibition renders the prohibited act invalid. 2

Hunting animals other than the dog

  • Whatever accepts training: some allowed all of them once trained, even the cat, as Ibn Sha'ban said; this is the school of Malik and his followers, the view of the jurists of the great cities, and is reported from Ibn Abbas: whatever hunting animal accepts training is an instrument for making game lawful. 2
  • The dog alone: some said there is no hunting with any animal but the dog - neither goshawk nor falcon nor any other - except what is caught alive and slaughtered; this is the view of Mujahid. 2
  • The dog and the goshawk: some excepted, among birds of prey, the goshawk alone and allowed its game. 2

From the edition's commentary

The commentator of the Dar al-Salam edition notes in the margin that those who allowed hunting with these animals required that the animal go when sent and come when called; that the majority do not require birds of prey to refrain from eating the game, citing Ibn Abbas: if the dog eats, do not eat, but if the falcon eats, eat, since you can beat a dog but cannot beat a falcon; and that the Shafi'is require of them what they require of the dog. 3

The view of Ibn Hazm the Zahiri in al-Muhalla

In the Book of Hunting of al-Muhalla, Ibn Hazm puts the dog and other four-legged predators on the same footing as the falcon and other birds of prey: once trained, what any of them kills is lawful when its owner sent it and named God on sending it, whether it killed by wounding, crushing, striking or strangling; if it ate any of the prey, the prey is forbidden. 4 He draws the line between trained and untrained from al-Ma'ida 4 on trained hunting animals, and argues that all predators hunt by nature for themselves, so training must add something they did not know, which can only be not setting off until sent and holding the prey without eating. 4 5

He reports their disagreement on when training is complete: Abu Hanifa and al-Shafi'i said that if it holds without eating time after time it is trained, without setting a number; Abu Yusuf and Muhammad ibn al-Hasan said three times, its kill being eaten from the fourth; Dawud said once, its kill being eaten from the second; and Abu Thawr said its kill is eaten from the first time. He chooses Abu Thawr's view, since the first act is what shows it is trained, so it hunted that time as a trained animal. 5 6 He faults Malik for disregarding whether the predator ate, and answers those who allow only what was wounded that a jarih in the language is an animal that earns, and that the verse allows what they hold for you without mentioning wounds. 6 7 He reports Abu Hanifa's view that a falcon's prey may be eaten even if the falcon ate from it. 8

At the start of the Book of Hunting he makes the slaughter of a runaway animal a shot with something that acts like a spear or arrow, citing 'Adi ibn Hatim (may God be pleased with him)'s report on the blunt arrow: "If it strikes with its point, eat; if it strikes with its side and kills, it is beaten to death, so do not eat"; he reports that 'Ammar, Salman and Sa'id ibn al-Musayyab allowed game killed with a stone or pellet, while 'Umar forbade it, which is the view of Abu Hanifa, Malik, al-Shafi'i and Abu Sulayman Dawud. 9 10 11

Not covered here

Ibn Rushd's other conditions for the hunting animal (training, sending, naming God) and hunting with weapons are not given here.

Opinions on the question

The question: Among the instruments that make game lawful: is it restricted to the dog?

First opinion · Sunni tradition (the museum's frame)Main reference

Every animal that accepts training is an instrument of lawful hunting

The view of Malik, his followers and the jurists of the great cities, reported from Ibn Abbas - even the cat, as Ibn Sha'ban said - resting on the general wording of the verse on trained hunting animals.

Held by: Malik ibn AnasAbdullah ibn Abbas

More opinions (2)

Sunni tradition (the museum's frame)Secondary opinion

No hunting with anything but the dog, unless the game is caught alive and slaughtered

The view of a group including Mujahid - neither goshawk nor falcon nor anything else; some of them excepted the goshawk alone among birds.

Held by: مجاهد بن جبر

Sunni tradition (the museum's frame)Secondary opinion

Zahiri (Ibn Hazm): the dog and all other four-legged and bird predators are alike once trained, and prey the predator has eaten from is forbidden

Ibn Hazm holds that the dog and other four-legged predators, and the falcon and other birds of prey, are alike: what they kill is lawful once they are trained; for him a trained predator is one that does not set off until its owner sends it and, having caught and killed, does not eat; what it catches on the first occasion it shows this is lawful, which is Abu Thawr's view against Dawud's; prey killed by wounding, crushing, striking or strangling is lawful; prey it has eaten from is forbidden, against Malik, and against Abu Hanifa for the falcon.

Held by: أبو محمد ابن حزم الأندلسي

People and things also explored

Ahliyya (legal capacity: to have rights and duties, and to act; its stages from the womb to full maturity, and what impairs it)· The five necessities (al-daruriyyat al-khams)· Democracy and the Sharia — compatibility and conflict· Fatwa on the satellite channels — its benefit and harm· Fatwa between freedom and monopoly· Secularism and Islam — conflict or concord· Unattested interest (al-maslaha al-mursala, istislah)· Judgement on one witness and the claimant's oath

Sources

  1. Ibn Rushd al-Hafid, Sharh Bidayat al-Mujtahid wa-Nihayat al-Muqtasid, vol. 3 (commentary, edition and hadith references by Dr al-Abbadi, Dar al-Salam 1416/1995) , p. 12
  2. Ibn Rushd al-Hafid, Sharh Bidayat al-Mujtahid wa-Nihayat al-Muqtasid, vol. 3 (commentary, edition and hadith references by Dr al-Abbadi, Dar al-Salam 1416/1995) , p. 13
  3. Ibn Rushd al-Hafid, Sharh Bidayat al-Mujtahid wa-Nihayat al-Muqtasid, vol. 3 (commentary, edition and hadith references by Dr al-Abbadi, Dar al-Salam 1416/1995) , p. 14
  4. Ibn Hazm, al-Muhalla bi-l-Athar, vol. 8 (Dar Ibn Hazm, Beirut, 1st ed., 1437/2016) , p.199
  5. Ibn Hazm, al-Muhalla bi-l-Athar, vol. 8 (Dar Ibn Hazm, Beirut, 1st ed., 1437/2016) , p.200
  6. Ibn Hazm, al-Muhalla bi-l-Athar, vol. 8 (Dar Ibn Hazm, Beirut, 1st ed., 1437/2016) , p.201
  7. Ibn Hazm, al-Muhalla bi-l-Athar, vol. 8 (Dar Ibn Hazm, Beirut, 1st ed., 1437/2016) , p.202
  8. Ibn Hazm, al-Muhalla bi-l-Athar, vol. 8 (Dar Ibn Hazm, Beirut, 1st ed., 1437/2016) , p.212
  9. Ibn Hazm, al-Muhalla bi-l-Athar, vol. 8 (Dar Ibn Hazm, Beirut, 1st ed., 1437/2016) , p.175
  10. Ibn Hazm, al-Muhalla bi-l-Athar, vol. 8 (Dar Ibn Hazm, Beirut, 1st ed., 1437/2016) , p.176
  11. Ibn Hazm, al-Muhalla bi-l-Athar, vol. 8 (Dar Ibn Hazm, Beirut, 1st ed., 1437/2016) , p.177
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “May one hunt with trained animals other than dogs?”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/questions/hunting-with-trained-animals-other-than-dogs/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-06.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · Help complete it · JSON

Wing

Ideas

Beliefs, concepts, sciences and schools, explained in plain words.
Related

Ahliyya (legal capacity: to have rights and duties, and to act; its stages from the womb to full maturity, and what impairs it)

Ahliyya is lexically suitability, and it is of two kinds: capacity to have rights and duties, the capacity of liability; and capacity to act, that is to perform acts recognised by the law. Its bearer passes through the stages of the foetus, childhood, discernment, puberty and maturity. Liability is complete from birth and incomplete for the foetus; the capacity to act is partial at discernment and full with puberty and reason. It is affected by heavenly impediments such as madness, imbecility, sleep, fainting, illness, slavery, menstruation, childbirth and death, and by acquired ones such as ignorance, drunkenness, jest, folly, travel, error and coercion.