Was Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami reliable in hadith?

People Ideas

هل كان أبو عبد الرحمن السلمي ثقة في الحديث؟

His contemporary Muhammad ibn Yusuf al-Qattan accused him of being unreliable and of fabricating hadith for the Sufis; al-Khatib al-Baghdadi answered that his standing among his townsmen was great and that he was a careful hadith scholar, Ibn al-Subki endorsed al-Khatib, and al-Dhahabi said he was not strong in hadith — the views as the editor of Tabaqat al-Sufiyya gathers them 1 2 3.

Depth

At a glance

Era
The Buyid, Fatimid and Seljuk Era
Region
Persia & Central Asia

Contested: This record includes matters on which scholars differ. The speaker's views are labelled as his, and other views are marked where no cited source yet exists.

Scripture and its sciencesSpirituality and Sufism

Summary

The question of Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami's standing in hadith, as the editor of Tabaqat al-Sufiyya, Nur al-Din Shurayba, gathers the views in his introduction. 1 All the views are those of Sunni scholars; the museum presents them without choosing between them.

Al-Qattan's view

The editor says the earliest to accuse al-Sulami of fabrication was his contemporary Muhammad ibn Yusuf al-Qattan of Nishapur, who told al-Khatib al-Baghdadi that al-Sulami was unreliable, had heard only a little from al-Asamm, and after the death of al-Hakim Ibn al-Bayyi' narrated from al-Asamm Yahya ibn Ma'in's Ta'rikh and much else, "and he used to fabricate hadith for the Sufis". 1

Al-Khatib and Ibn al-Subki

The editor quotes al-Khatib al-Baghdadi's comment that Abu 'Abd al-Rahman's standing among his townsmen was great, his place in his community high, and that he was moreover a careful hadith scholar; and the author of Tabaqat al-Shafi'iyya, who says al-Khatib's view is the correct one and that Abu 'Abd al-Rahman is reliable. 2 3

Al-Dhahabi's view

The editor quotes al-Dhahabi that al-Sulami put questions to al-Daraqutni about the states of shaykhs and narrators "as one who knows", and that he is "not strong in hadith"; the editor considers this the best thing said of him. 3

The editor's arguments

The editor takes up al-Qattan's three charges: al-Asamm died in Nishapur in 346 AH when al-Sulami was twenty-one, and al-Sulami had begun writing from al-Sibghi in 333 AH at the age of eight, so how could he have heard little from al-Asamm? Why would he wait for Ibn al-Bayyi''s death in 405 AH to narrate, and why did no contemporary but al-Qattan accuse him? He concludes it was "a matter of envy". 2 The charge of fabricating for the Sufis, and some contemporary researchers' suggestion that he may have put Sufi sayings into the masters' mouths, he calls exaggerated: his books, he says, contain sound, fair, weak and fabricated hadith, like those of others who wrote on hadith without devoting themselves to it. 3 He then quotes Abu Nu'aym's praise of him as one fully devoted to grounding and refining the Sufi way as the early generations had set it out, and al-Hakim's words: "If Abu 'Abd al-Rahman is not one of the substitutes (abdal), God has no saint on earth." 3 4

The report in Talbis Iblis

Ibn al-Jawzi quotes al-Qattan's same words in Talbis Iblis with his chain through Abu Mansur al-Qazzaz from al-Khatib, in the course of his critique of al-Sulami's Haqa'iq al-Tafsir, in which, he says, al-Sulami interpreted the Qur'an by what occurred to the Sufis without grounding it in any principle of learning; Ibn al-Jawzi does not quote there the reply of al-Khatib that the editor of the Tabaqat reports. 5 2

Opinions on the question

The question: Al-Qattan's charge of fabrication against al-Sulami and the scholars' responses.

First opinion · Sunni tradition (the museum's frame)Main reference

Unreliable, and he fabricated hadith for the Sufis: the view of Muhammad ibn Yusuf al-Qattan

Al-Qattan told al-Khatib al-Baghdadi that al-Sulami was unreliable, had heard only a little from al-Asamm, and after the death of al-Hakim Ibn al-Bayyi' narrated from al-Asamm Yahya ibn Ma'in's Ta'rikh and much else, and that he fabricated hadith for the Sufis.

Basis: Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami, Tabaqat al-Sufiyya, ed. Nur al-Din Shurayba (Maktabat al-Khanji, Cairo, 3rd ed., 1406 AH / 1986) p. 44 (introduction, quoting al-Khatib) Ibn al-Jawzi, Talbis Iblis, corrected and annotated by Muhammad Munir 'Abduh Agha al-Dimashqi, 2nd printing (Idarat al-Tiba'a al-Muniriyya, Egypt (Misr) 1347 AH / 1928) PDF p. 168: Ibn al-Jawzi quotes al-Qattan's words with his chain through al-Khatib in his critique of Haqa'iq al-Tafsir

More opinions (3)

Sunni tradition (the museum's frame)Main reference

Of great standing and a careful hadith scholar, and reliable: the view of al-Khatib al-Baghdadi and Ibn al-Subki

Al-Khatib commented on al-Qattan's words that Abu 'Abd al-Rahman's standing among his townsmen was great and his place in his community high, and that he was moreover a careful hadith scholar; the author of Tabaqat al-Shafi'iyya said al-Khatib's view is correct, Abu 'Abd al-Rahman is reliable, and al-Qattan's words count for nothing.

Held by: Al-Khatib al-Baghdadi

Basis: Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami, Tabaqat al-Sufiyya, ed. Nur al-Din Shurayba (Maktabat al-Khanji, Cairo, 3rd ed., 1406 AH / 1986) pp. 45-46 (introduction)

Sunni tradition (the museum's frame)Main reference

Knowledgeable about narrators but not strong in hadith: the view of al-Dhahabi

The editor quotes al-Dhahabi that al-Sulami put questions to al-Daraqutni about the states of shaykhs and narrators 'as one who knows', and that he is 'not strong in hadith'; the editor considers this the best thing said of him.

Held by: al-Dhahabi

Basis: Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami, Tabaqat al-Sufiyya, ed. Nur al-Din Shurayba (Maktabat al-Khanji, Cairo, 3rd ed., 1406 AH / 1986) p. 46 (introduction)

Academic viewSecondary opinion

He may have put Sufi sayings into the mouths of the masters: the view of some contemporary researchers as the editor reports it

The editor mentions that some contemporary researchers did not rule out that al-Sulami put many Sufi sayings into the masters' mouths to suit their leanings; the editor calls this charge 'exaggerated', saying his books contain sound, fair, weak and fabricated hadith alike, as with others who wrote on hadith without devoting themselves to it.

Basis: Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami, Tabaqat al-Sufiyya, ed. Nur al-Din Shurayba (Maktabat al-Khanji, Cairo, 3rd ed., 1406 AH / 1986) p. 46 (introduction)

Connections

Explore the connections

Related to
Abu Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami

People and things also explored

Al-Risala al-Qushayriyya (The Epistle of al-Qushayri)· Talbis Iblis (The Devil's Delusion)· Abu Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami· Abu'l-Hasan al-Zawzani· Nishapur· Ibn al-A'rabi, Ahmad ibn Muhammad· Difaf al-Kawthar: The Banks of al-Kawthar· Madrasat al-Hayat: The School of Life (commentary on Sayd al-Khatir)

Sources

  1. Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami, Tabaqat al-Sufiyya, ed. Nur al-Din Shurayba (Maktabat al-Khanji, Cairo, 3rd ed., 1406 AH / 1986) , p. 44
  2. Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami, Tabaqat al-Sufiyya, ed. Nur al-Din Shurayba (Maktabat al-Khanji, Cairo, 3rd ed., 1406 AH / 1986) , p. 45
  3. Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami, Tabaqat al-Sufiyya, ed. Nur al-Din Shurayba (Maktabat al-Khanji, Cairo, 3rd ed., 1406 AH / 1986) , p. 46
  4. Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami, Tabaqat al-Sufiyya, ed. Nur al-Din Shurayba (Maktabat al-Khanji, Cairo, 3rd ed., 1406 AH / 1986) , p. 47
  5. Ibn al-Jawzi, Talbis Iblis, corrected and annotated by Muhammad Munir 'Abduh Agha al-Dimashqi, 2nd printing (Idarat al-Tiba'a al-Muniriyya, Egypt (Misr) 1347 AH / 1928) , p. 168
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Was Abu 'Abd al-Rahman al-Sulami reliable in hadith?”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/questions/reliability-of-al-sulami/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-06.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · Help complete it · JSON

Wing

People

Prophets, companions, scholars, rulers, scientists, poets, travelers: women and men who shaped the story.
Related

Al-Risala al-Qushayriyya (The Epistle of al-Qushayri)

An epistle written by Abu al-Qasim 'Abd al-Karim ibn Hawazin al-Qushayri (d. 465 AH) 'to the community of Sufis in the lands of Islam' in 437 AH, lamenting the decline of the path in his time; it opens with the creed of the shaykhs on the principles of religion, gives notices of eighty-three of their masters, explains their terms, devotes chapters to the stations and states from repentance to love, audition and miracles, and ends with counsel to disciples.