Does Ibn Atiyya's commentary lean towards the Mu'tazila?

هل في تفسير ابن عطية ميل إلى الاعتزال؟

Al-Muharrar al-Wajiz has been charged with Mu'tazili leanings: Ibn Taymiyya held it closer to the Sunna than al-Kashshaf but following those it calls 'the verifiers', theologians of the kalam schools; Ibn Arafa the Maliki, as quoted by Ibn Hajar al-Haytami, held it more dangerous than al-Kashshaf because it slips Mu'tazilism in; Abd al-Wahhab Fayid rejects the charge and argues that it follows the Sunni position.

Depth

At a glance

Region
al-Andalus & Europe

Contested: This record includes matters on which scholars differ. The speaker's views are labelled as his, and other views are marked where no cited source yet exists.

Scripture and its sciencesSects and schools

Summary

Ibn Atiyya's al-Muharrar al-Wajiz counts among the standard Sunni commentaries, yet two major scholars charged it with leaning towards the Mu'tazila, as Majd Makki notes in his introduction to the book: Ibn Taymiyya, and Ibn Hajar al-Haytami quoting Ibn Arafa the Maliki. 1 The question concerns the commentary's relation to theology (kalam): Majd Makki notes that in matters of creed Ibn Atiyya drew on the works of al-Ash'ari, al-Baqillani and al-Juwayni. 2

What Ibn Taymiyya said

In his introduction to the principles of tafsir, Ibn Taymiyya states that the commentary of Ibn Atiyya and its like is "more faithful to the Sunna and the community, and safer from innovation" than al-Kashshaf; he then faults it for leaving aside, without reporting it, what Ibn Jarir transmitted from the early generations, and giving instead what it claims to be the view of "the verifiers" — by whom, he says, it means a group of theologians who established their principles by methods of the same kind as those of the Mu'tazila, though nearer to the Sunna than the Mu'tazila — so that this is "part of interpretation according to a school". 1 In his Fatawa he says that Ibn Atiyya's commentary is better than al-Zamakhshari's, sounder in transmission and further from innovation, though it contains some, "indeed perhaps the most preferable of these commentaries". 1 3

What al-Haytami reported from Ibn Arafa

Ibn Hajar al-Haytami, in al-Fatawa al-Hadithiyya, quotes Ibn Arafa the Maliki as holding Ibn Atiyya's commentary more dangerous than al-Kashshaf: al-Zamakhshari's Mu'tazilism was well known, so readers of his commentary were on their guard, whereas Ibn Atiyya was known as a Sunni "but slips Mu'tazilism into his commentary". 1

The reply to the charge

Majd Makki records that his teacher Dr Abd al-Wahhab Fayid examined the charge in Manhaj Ibn Atiyya fi Tafsir al-Qur'an, showed that it has no sound basis and that Ibn Atiyya kept to the Sunni position without departing from it and refuted Mu'tazili views, and concluded after long study that the charge is "rejected in form and in substance". 1 Among earlier judgements Majd Makki quotes Ibn Juzayy, who calls Ibn Atiyya "mindful of the Sunna". 4

Views

Opinions on the question

The question: The relation of Ibn Atiyya's commentary to the Mu'tazila and the kalam schools

First opinion · Sunni tradition (the museum's frame) · Sunni: Ibn TaymiyyaMain reference

closer to the Sunna than al-Kashshaf and further from innovation, but at times it leaves the early generations' views for those of the theologians 1.
More opinions (3)

Sunni tradition (the museum's frame) · Sunni: Ibn Arafa the Maliki, as quoted by Ibn Hajar al-HaytamiMain reference

more dangerous than al-Kashshaf because it slips Mu'tazilism in 1.

Sunni tradition (the museum's frame) · Sunni: Abd al-Wahhab Fayid and Majd MakkiMain reference

the charge is rejected; Ibn Atiyya follows the Sunni position and refutes the Mu'tazila 1.

Not yet given here viewOther opinion

the texts of Ibn Taymiyya and al-Haytami have not yet been checked in their own sources, nor the passages of the commentary held to be Mu'tazili, and no academic view has been added.

Connections

Explore the connections

Subject of
al-Muharrar al-Wajiz fi Tafsir al-Kitab al-'Aziz (Tafsir Ibn Atiyya)
Mentions
al-Muharrar al-Wajiz fi Tafsir al-Kitab al-'Aziz (Tafsir Ibn Atiyya)· al-Kashshaf 'an Haqa'iq al-Tanzil

People and things also explored

Fath al-Qadir (al-Shawkani's commentary on the Qur'an)· Ibn Atiyah al-Andalusi· How did Sunni scholars treat al-Kashshaf, given its Mu'tazili content?· al-Jami' li-Ahkam al-Qur'an (Tafsir al-Qurtubi)· Jami' al-Bayan (Tafsir al-Tabari)· The seven ahruf· Tafsir by opinion (bi'l-ra'y)· Ibn al-Munayyir

Sources

  1. al-Muharrar al-Wajiz fi Tafsir al-Kitab al-'Aziz — Ibn Atiyya (Dar Ibn Hazm, one volume, introduced by Majd Makki) , p.7
  2. al-Muharrar al-Wajiz fi Tafsir al-Kitab al-'Aziz — Ibn Atiyya (Dar Ibn Hazm, one volume, introduced by Majd Makki) , p.5
  3. al-Muharrar al-Wajiz fi Tafsir al-Kitab al-'Aziz — Ibn Atiyya (Dar Ibn Hazm, one volume, introduced by Majd Makki) , p.12
  4. al-Muharrar al-Wajiz fi Tafsir al-Kitab al-'Aziz — Ibn Atiyya (Dar Ibn Hazm, one volume, introduced by Majd Makki) , p.8
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Does Ibn Atiyya's commentary lean towards the Mu'tazila?”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/questions/was-ibn-atiyyas-tafsir-mutazili/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-04.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · Help complete it · JSON

Wing

Ideas

Beliefs, concepts, sciences and schools, explained in plain words.
Related

Fath al-Qadir (al-Shawkani's commentary on the Qur'an)

A complete commentary on the Qur'an by Muhammad ibn Ali al-Shawkani (d. 1250 AH), designed to unite the method of the transmitters, who confined themselves to reports, with that of the reasoners, who relied on the Arabic language and the instrumental sciences, while weighing conflicting interpretations and explaining the lexical, grammatical and rhetorical meaning; many of its reports are drawn from al-Suyuti's al-Durr al-Manthur. Its manuscript original is titled Matla' al-Badrayn wa-Majma' al-Bahrayn.