Millet

الملّة

Millet is the Turkish rendering of Arabic milla, meaning religion, religious community and nation, three senses used side by side in the Ottoman Empire until the Tanzimat and after. The Encyclopaedia of Islam stresses that the so-called millet system was not one institution but a set of largely social arrangements varying with time and place, and that the word was not used exclusively or consistently for non-Muslim communities before the nineteenth century 1 2.

Depth

At a glance

Era
The Gunpowder Empires
Region
Anatolia

Non-Muslim minorities under Muslim rule

Overview

Millet is the Turkish rendering of the Arabic milla. The Encyclopaedia of Islam says it indicates religion, religious community and nation, and that these three basic meanings were used concurrently in the Ottoman Empire until the Tanzimat period and afterwards. 1

First sense: religion, confession, rite

In the Qur'an, the article says, milla is largely identical with din and should be translated "religion"; it occurs most often in the phrase for the religion of Ibrahim, and less often for the religion of the heathens. 1 No Qur'anic example suggests translating it as congregation or people. 1 In later usage the word keeps this meaning, and the article finds it still in nineteenth-century documents, especially official letters and charters of the Ottoman, Mamluk and Safavid courts addressed to prominent Christians. 1 Examples include a letter from the Mamluk sultan Qa'itbay to the Doge of Venice in 877/1473 and a permit of Shah Abbas II for the Carmelites of Isfahan in 1052/1642. 1 An Ottoman text of 1108/1697 even speaks of converts to the "papal millet", using it alongside the word for the Latin rite. 1 3

Second sense: a religious community

When millet means a community of the same confession, the article asks whether it refers to Ottoman non-Muslim subjects under the covenant of protection (dhimma; see also ahl al-dhimma). 3 It records a scholarly debate. One view, by Benjamin Braude, holds that the word long meant Christians outside the empire and was not typically used for dhimmis before the nineteenth century. The article's author disagrees in part: in the documents of the imperial council published by Refik, covering 1689 to 1839, every use of millet as a confessional community refers to non-Muslim Ottoman subjects, Greek Orthodox, Armenian and Catholic Christians and Jews. 3

The article gives dated landmarks. A document of 1697 treats the Orthodox and Armenian communities as known millets. A document of 1591 calls the Armenian community an empire-wide religious community. The Greek Orthodox millet appears as millet-i Rum in a document of 1170/1757, and the Jewish and Catholic millets are named only in 1255/1839. Late in the eighteenth century the fiscal administration even spoke of "the three" non-Muslim communities. 3 Foreign merchants living under the Capitulations seem to have been called both a community and a millet by analogy. 3

Third sense: a nation, part of a people

In a third meaning millet is a sovereign nation, or part of a people. The article's examples are the "three nations" of Transylvania, the Hungarians, Szekelys and Saxons, between 1652 and 1687, whose delegates sat with the prince of a vassal state; and the European powers named in the Treaty of Kucuk Kaynarca of 1774, who in Islamic terms belonged to the abode of war. 2

It adds that the Porte began to call the rebellious Serbs and Greeks a millet, a separate nation, only when it judged that their covenant of protection had been withdrawn, so that the second and third senses stood in contradiction. The Ottoman side kept arguing in 1827 that all the Greeks formed one millet, because their rite and patriarch were one. 2

The "millet system" debated

The article quotes a view that there was no overall administrative system for non-Muslims, only a set of largely social arrangements varying over time and place. It accepts that this cannot be pressed too far, but concludes that millet in the sense of a non-Muslim community was in no way used exclusively or consistently before the nineteenth century. 2 The regular use can be shown only in some central offices, not in provincial or local administration, where another word, ta'ife, was frequent; the clerk of the imperial council might use millet where the grand vizier used ta'ife. 2

The author interprets this as showing that, from the centre, the communities were seen as religious and juridical bodies under their ecclesiastical heads, ideally of empire-wide scope. He suggests the idea may have emerged in the seventeenth century as the Porte, guarantor of the existing order, felt obliged to protect the traditional communities against Western missions. 2 4 This is the article's reading, offered as conceivable, and the museum records it as one voice in an open debate. 4

See also

For the quarter that housed the seat of the Greek Orthodox Patriarch, see Fener. See also the Ottoman Empire.

Connections

Explore the connections

Related to
Dhimma (the covenant of protection)· Ahl al-Dhimma (the protected non-Muslim subjects of an Islamic state, their covenant, rights, duties and limits)· Ottoman Empire· Fener (Phanar)

People and things also explored

Jizya (capitation on treaty peoples)· The Prophet's letter to the kings of Himyar· What Did Muslims Bring to the World (television programme)· Ahl al-Dhimma (the protected non-Muslim subjects of an Islamic state, their covenant, rights, duties and limits)· Dhimma (the covenant of protection)· al-Awza'i's Letter to Salih ibn Ali· The Conquest of al-Raqqa· The Conquest of Edessa (al-Ruha)

Sources

  1. Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition (Leiden: Brill, 1954–2008), 13 volumes , vol. 7 p. 81
  2. Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition (Leiden: Brill, 1954–2008), 13 volumes , vol. 7 p. 83
  3. Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition (Leiden: Brill, 1954–2008), 13 volumes , vol. 7 p. 82
  4. Encyclopaedia of Islam, 2nd edition (Leiden: Brill, 1954–2008), 13 volumes , vol. 7 p. 84
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “Millet”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/concept/millet/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Last updated 2026-11-12.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · Help complete it · JSON

Wing

Ideas

Beliefs, concepts, sciences and schools, explained in plain words.
Related

Jizya (capitation on treaty peoples)

Jizya in al-Baladhuri is what the People of the Book pay per head under treaty in return for confirmation in their religion and lands: he reports from al-Zuhri 'the first of the People of the Book to pay the jizya, so far as we know, were the people of Najran, who were Christians; then the people of Ayla, Adhruh and the people of Adhri'at paid jizya in the Tabuk campaign'; its forms with him include a dinar per hālim per year — the treaty of Ayla totalling three hundred dinars, Jurash a dinar per hālim plus hospitality for Muslims, Adhruh a hundred dinars every Rajab, and the Jews of Maqna a quarter of the 'uruk catch, a quarter of the women's spinning and a quarter of the fruits — beyond which the people of Maqna owed 'no jizya and no corvée'; when Umar ibn Abd al-Aziz took office he had the people of Najran counted, found them at a tithe of their former number and said 'I see this treaty is a jizya on their heads, not a treaty on their lands — and the jizya of the dead and of the Muslim lapses', so he set them at two hundred hullas. The Encyclopaedia of Islam, second edition, defines it as the poll-tax levied on non-Muslims in Muslim states and calls the history of its origins extremely complex, with a scholarly dispute over whether the Arabs at first levied a collective tribute or distinguished a tax on persons from a tax on land. It reports that under the Abbasids the word came to mean only the poll-tax on dhimmis, charged on adult, free, able-bodied men, and that the Ottomans collected it by a three-grade scale of 48, 24 and 12 silver dirhams until its disappearance from modern Muslim states.