The three who were left behind after Tabuk

الثلاثة الذين خُلّفوا بعد تبوك

October 630 CE · Rajab 9 AH

Medina

After the Prophet returned to Medina he forbade speech with three Muslims who had stayed behind from Tabuk 'without doubt and without hypocrisy' in Ibn Ishaq's words — Ka'b ibn Malik, Murara ibn al-Rabi' and Hilal ibn Umayya. People withdrew from them for fifty nights until their repentance was announced after the dawn prayer.

Depth

At a glance

Era
The Prophetic Era
Region
Arabia
Review
Draft Completeness 1/5 · Help complete it

In time

620630640
The Prophetic Era · The Rashidun Caliphate

In space

Medina

Map: Natural Earth, public domain · places and route from the graph

Summary

The Prophet entered Medina after Tabuk, a band of hypocrites having stayed behind per Ibn Ishaq — and three Muslims stayed behind "in neither doubt nor hypocrisy": Ka'b ibn Malik, Marara ibn al-Rabi' and Hilal ibn Umayya. 1

The account

Ibn Ishaq said: the Prophet said to his companions "speak to none of these three", and the hypocrites who stayed behind came swearing oaths and making excuses, and he pardoned them — "and the Muslims shunned speech with those three". 1 The story's detail is Ka'b ibn Malik's own account, on Ibn Ishaq's chain from al-Zuhri, in Ka'b's account. 1

The story's stages

Concepts

Source notes and markers of doubt

  • Describing the others who stayed behind as hypocrites is Ibn Ishaq's phrasing; none of them is named here.
  • "And neither God nor His Messenger excused them" (p. 175): the verb's vowelling on the page is not settled, and the phrase attaches to the excusers in context; to be reviewed.
  • "Eighty-odd men", the number of the excusers, is on Ka'b's tongue (p. 177).

Opinions on the question

The question: How is the story of the three who were left behind after Tabuk understood?

First opinion · Sunni tradition (the museum's frame)Main reference

Ibn Ishaq relates the story from Ka'b ibn Malik himself, describes the three as having stayed behind 'without doubt and without hypocrisy', and transmits the revelation of the verses on their repentance (9:117-118); jurists derive from the story rulings on repentance, truthfulness and shunning the disobedient — this derivation still needs review of specific commentaries (needs_source).
More opinions (1)

Academic viewSecondary opinion

Researchers see in the story an example of social discipline in Medinan society through the boycott as a sanction; the summary needs a specific academic reference (needs_source).

Connections

Explore the connections

Had participant
Hilal ibn Umayya al-WaqifiKa'b ibn Malik al-AnsariMurara ibn al-Rabi al-AmriMuhammad
Has part
The fifty-night boycott of the threeThe letter of the king of Ghassan to Ka'b ibn MalikKa'b and Abu Qatada at the garden wallKa'b ibn Malik puts off his preparations for TabukKa'b offers his wealth and vows to speak only the truthKa'b tells the Prophet the truthThe order that the three keep apart from their wivesThe Prophet's return and the excuses of those who stayed behindThe acceptance of the repentance of the three
Part of
The expedition to Tabuk
Occurred at
Medina
Mentioned in
Ka'b ibn Malik's account of staying behind at Tabuk

People and things also explored

MedinaKa'b ibn Malik al-AnsariMuhammadThe fifty-night boycott of the threeThe acceptance of the repentance of the threeThe order that the three keep apart from their wivesHilal ibn Umayya al-WaqifiMurara ibn al-Rabi al-Amri

Sources

  1. al-Sira al-Nabawiyya — Ibn Hisham, al-Saqqa edition (1355/1936), 4/175
Cite this page

islam.museum contributors. “The three who were left behind after Tabuk”. islam.museum, https://islam.museum/en/event/the-three-left-behind/. CC BY-SA 4.0. Accessed 2026-10-12.

Improve this page on GitHub · Report an error · JSON

Wing

Time

Eras, timelines, this day in history, any year in the Islamic world.
Related

Medina

City in the Hejaz to which the Prophet migrated in 622 CE; site of the Prophet's Mosque and the first Muslim community.